PEX vs. SSO
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - PEX is a Financials Equities fund tracking the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.62%/yr vs 24.26%/yr for SSO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
PEX vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -13.80% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 4.62%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.26% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -14.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
SSO
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 42.28%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 24.26%
PEX vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.80% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 12.95% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and SSO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between PEX and SSO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEX vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
SSO
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PEX
SSO
Industrials
PEX
SSO
Healthcare
PEX
SSO
Basic Materials
PEX
SSO
Communication Services
PEX
-
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
SSO
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
SSO
Energy
PEX
-
SSO
Real Estate
PEX
-
SSO
Technology
PEX
-
SSO
Utilities
PEX
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
SSO
PEX vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.30 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.34 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 9.90 | -11.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -84.67% | +35.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -18.17% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -35.21% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -46.73% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -59.34% | +10.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.09% | -6.70% | -15.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -19.53% | +11.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.06% | 4.28% | +8.78% |
Volatility
PEX vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) is 5.26%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 9.70%. This indicates that PEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 9.70% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 19.65% | -6.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.93% | 24.92% | -8.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 33.85% | -15.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 35.93% | -16.63% |
PEX vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, more than SSO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 13.01% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and SSO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSO has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to PEX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.26% vs 4.62% for PEX. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, PEX has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.26% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 13.01%, compared with 0.65% for SSO.
PEX is categorized as Financials Equities, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer