PESPX vs. FZAMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PESPX (BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund) and FZAMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PESPX returned 10.94%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for FZAMX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PESPX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FZAMX.

Performance

PESPX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund (PESPX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PESPX achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 21.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PESPX has underperformed FZAMX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while FZAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.

PESPX

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 13.87%
• 6M: 14.02%
• 1Y: 24.86%
• 3Y*: 14.68%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 10.94%

FZAMX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 6M: 22.92%
• 1Y: 38.64%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PESPX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PESPX BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund	13.87%	6.90%	11.88%	14.75%	-13.67%	24.34%	13.30%	40.74%	-10.55%	15.99%
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	21.57%	12.00%	17.39%	15.15%	-14.70%	25.40%	18.84%	23.85%	-14.85%	20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PESPX and FZAMX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013	0.97

The correlation between PESPX and FZAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PESPX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PESPX

PESPX Risk / Return Rank: 43
PESPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PESPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PESPX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
PESPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PESPX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FZAMX

FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PESPX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund (PESPX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PESPX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.35	-0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	3.19	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.41	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	4.12	-1.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.88	16.56	-5.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PESPX vs. FZAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PESPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the FZAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PESPX and FZAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PESPX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	2.35	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.56	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.59	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.57	-0.27

Drawdowns

PESPX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PESPX drawdown since its inception was -61.56%, which is greater than FZAMX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PESPX and FZAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PESPX	FZAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.56%	-42.32%	-19.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-9.77%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.18%	-25.24%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.18%	-25.24%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.09%	-42.32%	+0.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.38%	-6.08%	-4.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.43%	+0.01%

Volatility

PESPX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund (PESPX) is 4.46%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that PESPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PESPX	FZAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	5.00%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.31%	13.74%	-2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.46%	17.14%	-1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.67%	20.23%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.59%	20.94%	+0.65%

PESPX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PESPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

PESPX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison

PESPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.75%, more than FZAMX's 5.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	5.80%	10.09%	6.93%	2.83%	5.86%	18.58%	1.41%	3.50%	10.72%	7.81%	5.00%	4.90%
PESPX BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund	10.75%	12.24%	11.73%	8.19%	16.04%	15.10%	11.21%	21.60%	14.61%	9.22%	1.09%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PESPX and FZAMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, PESPX and FZAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PESPX or FZAMX?

FZAMX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to PESPX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PESPX dropped -61.56% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.