PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEQSX vs. FLCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEQSX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEQSX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 15.46% return.


PEQSX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.60%
YTD
10.36%
6M
9.11%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
14.52%

FLCOX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.49%
YTD
15.46%
6M
14.24%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEQSX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEQSX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6
10.36%20.49%19.41%15.45%-2.74%27.33%6.23%29.79%-8.29%19.15%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
15.46%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PEQSX and FLCOX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.97

The correlation between PEQSX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEQSX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEQSX
PEQSX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PEQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PEQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEQSX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEQSXFLCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

4.05

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.80

16.84

-3.04

PEQSX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEQSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEQSX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEQSX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEQSX drawdown since its inception was -36.04%, smaller than the maximum FLCOX drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEQSX and FLCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEQSXFLCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.04%

-38.28%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-6.80%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-15.60%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-19.00%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-1.12%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-4.43%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.63%

+0.23%

Volatility

PEQSX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) have volatilities of 3.94% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEQSXFLCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

4.14%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

8.73%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

11.29%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

14.87%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.62%

-0.65%

PEQSX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEQSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEQSX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

PEQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than FLCOX's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.31%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%
PEQSX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6
5.10%5.69%7.14%5.26%7.40%7.40%6.30%3.66%6.08%3.56%2.66%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PEQSX and FLCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCOX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to PEQSX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEQSX dropped -36.04% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEQSX and FLCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer