PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEPS vs. TDVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEPS vs. TDVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEPS achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than TDVI's 30.16% return.


PEPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.44%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.79%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDVI

1D
-1.77%
1M
15.46%
YTD
30.16%
6M
28.30%
1Y
52.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEPS vs. TDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
10.67%20.32%-1.45%
TDVI
FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF
30.16%24.75%-3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PEPS and TDVI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.78

The correlation between PEPS and TDVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEPS vs. TDVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TDVI
TDVI Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEPS vs. TDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEPSTDVIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

3.00

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

3.94

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.51

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

5.38

-2.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.28

17.05

-1.77

PEPS vs. TDVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEPS Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the TDVI Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEPS and TDVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEPSTDVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

3.00

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.67

-0.62

Drawdowns

PEPS vs. TDVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEPS drawdown since its inception was -21.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TDVI drawdown of -22.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEPS and TDVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEPSTDVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.26%

-22.08%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-9.83%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-1.77%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-2.98%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

3.09%

-1.00%

Volatility

PEPS vs. TDVI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) is 2.77%, while FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that PEPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEPSTDVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

6.59%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

13.26%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

17.69%

-4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

19.65%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

19.65%

-1.34%

PEPS vs. TDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEPS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEPS vs. TDVI - Dividend Comparison

PEPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than TDVI's 6.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.88%1.00%0.17%0.00%
TDVI
FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF
6.41%7.53%7.90%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEPS and TDVI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDVI has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to PEPS (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEPS dropped -21.26% vs TDVI's -22.08%.

On 1-year performance, TDVI leads with 52.59% vs 31.83% for PEPS. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PEPS has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDVI has performed better with a 52.59% return vs 31.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TDVI.

TDVI has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Parametric and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PEPS and 0.75% for TDVI.

TDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEPS and TDVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer