PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEPS vs. EIPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEPS vs. EIPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEPS achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than EIPI's 16.72% return.


PEPS

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.90%
6M
7.86%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EIPI

1D
1.40%
1M
1.71%
6M
16.37%
YTD
16.72%
1Y
22.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEPS vs. EIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
10.36%20.32%-1.42%
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
16.72%12.38%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PEPS and EIPI is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.21

The correlation between PEPS and EIPI shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEPS vs. EIPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EIPI
EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEPS vs. EIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEPSEIPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

4.81

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

14.07

-2.80

PEPS vs. EIPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEPS Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the EIPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEPS and EIPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEPS vs. EIPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEPS drawdown since its inception was -21.26%, which is greater than EIPI's maximum drawdown of -12.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEPS and EIPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEPSEIPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.26%

-12.33%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-4.77%

-5.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.77%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-1.72%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.63%

+0.58%

Volatility

PEPS vs. EIPI - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) have volatilities of 4.20% and 4.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEPSEIPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

4.19%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

7.84%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

10.06%

+3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

13.08%

+5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

13.08%

+5.13%

PEPS vs. EIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEPS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPI's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEPS vs. EIPI - Dividend Comparison

PEPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than EIPI's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
6.69%9.71%6.31%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.92%1.00%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEPS and EIPI have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEPS has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to EIPI (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEPS dropped -21.26% vs EIPI's -12.33%.

On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 24.89% vs 22.83% for EIPI. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 24.89% return vs 22.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.

EIPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 0.92% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Parametric and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PEPS and 1.11% for EIPI.

EIPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEPS and EIPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer