PEPS vs. EIPI
PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) and EIPI (FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PEPS returned 33.38% vs 21.45% for EIPI. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEPS charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for EIPI.
Performance
PEPS vs. EIPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEPS achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than EIPI's 14.55% return.
PEPS
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 11.73%
- 1Y
- 33.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIPI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 6M
- 13.67%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS vs. EIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 11.24% | 20.32% | -1.45% |
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF | 14.55% | 12.38% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEPS and EIPI is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024 | 0.25 |
The correlation between PEPS and EIPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEPS vs. EIPI — Risk / Return Rank
PEPS
EIPI
PEPS vs. EIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEPS | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.26 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.36 | 3.30 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.38 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 5.39 | -1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.23 | 16.30 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEPS | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.26 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.52 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
PEPS vs. EIPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEPS drawdown since its inception was -21.26%, which is greater than EIPI's maximum drawdown of -12.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEPS and EIPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEPS | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.26% | -12.33% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -4.00% | -5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.62% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -1.67% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.32% | +0.77% |
Volatility
PEPS vs. EIPI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) is 2.75%, while FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that PEPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEPS | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 3.59% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 7.30% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 9.55% | +3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 13.08% | +5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 13.08% | +5.24% |
PEPS vs. EIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEPS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPI's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEPS vs. EIPI - Dividend Comparison
PEPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than EIPI's 6.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF | 6.78% | 9.71% | 6.31% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEPS and EIPI have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIPI has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to PEPS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEPS dropped -21.26% vs EIPI's -12.33%.
On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 33.38% vs 21.45% for EIPI. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PEPS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 33.38% return vs 21.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.
EIPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: Parametric and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PEPS and 1.11% for EIPI.
PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEPS and EIPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer