PEPS vs. ACII

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) and ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PEPS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ACII.

Performance

PEPS vs. ACII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PEPS

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 6.44%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 10.79%
• 1Y: 31.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACII

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEPS vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	0.42%
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF	-1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PEPS and ACII is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	1.00

Return for Risk

PEPS vs. ACII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEPS

PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 73
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEPS vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEPS	ACII	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.28	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEPS	ACII	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	-7.55	+8.60

Drawdowns

PEPS vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEPS drawdown since its inception was -21.26%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEPS and ACII.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEPS	ACII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.26%	-1.27%	-19.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-1.27%	+0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-0.42%	-2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PEPS	ACII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.83%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	7.65%	+5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.31%	7.65%	+10.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	7.65%	+10.66%

PEPS vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEPS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEPS vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison

PEPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than ACII's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	0.88%	1.00%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEPS and ACII in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, PEPS and ACII move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PEPS or ACII?

On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEPS or ACII?

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEPS or ACII?

PEPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.

What is the main difference between PEPS and ACII?

They also come from different issuers: Parametric and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PEPS and 0.79% for ACII.