PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEPFX vs. FPADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEPFX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund (PEPFX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEPFX achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 16.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PEPFX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 10.02%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.


PEPFX

1D
2.18%
1M
2.66%
6M
1.47%
YTD
11.49%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
10.02%
ALL TIME*
8.69%

FPADX

1D
3.98%
1M
-3.45%
6M
7.70%
YTD
16.52%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.35%
ALL TIME*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PEPFX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEPFX
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund
11.49%20.60%2.45%22.46%-10.50%15.79%9.76%13.56%-12.62%29.07%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
16.52%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%18.28%-14.65%35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PEPFX and FPADX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2015

0.87

The correlation between PEPFX and FPADX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEPFX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEPFX
PEPFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PEPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEPFX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund (PEPFX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEPFXFPADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.34

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

7.44

-3.26

PEPFX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEPFX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEPFX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEPFX drawdown since its inception was -46.88%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEPFX and FPADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEPFXFPADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.88%

-39.16%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-13.83%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-16.09%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.99%

-34.43%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

-39.16%

-7.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-10.40%

+4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

-13.18%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

4.33%

-0.44%

Volatility

PEPFX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund (PEPFX) is 5.02%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 9.49%. This indicates that PEPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEPFXFPADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

9.49%

-4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

20.91%

-8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

22.72%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.07%

18.12%

-3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

18.25%

-1.04%

PEPFX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEPFX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEPFX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

PEPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than FPADX's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
2.02%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%
PEPFX
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund
2.61%2.91%1.99%4.05%11.30%9.12%9.73%2.21%11.05%8.06%2.74%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEPFX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPADX has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to PEPFX (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEPFX dropped -46.88% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

FPADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEPFX and FPADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer