PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEP vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PEP vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEP achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -15.74% return.


PEP

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
2.49%
6M
-2.36%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
-4.09%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
6.62%

UBER

1D
-1.01%
1M
-7.82%
YTD
-15.74%
6M
-19.10%
1Y
-17.97%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEP vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
2.49%-1.85%-7.60%-3.29%6.78%20.56%11.67%10.74%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-15.74%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PEP and UBER is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.06

The correlation between PEP and UBER shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PEP:

$197.79B

UBER:

$142.62B

EPS

PEP:

$6.37

UBER:

$4.05

PE Ratio

PEP:

22.64

UBER:

16.98

PEG Ratio

PEP:

7.83

UBER:

0.11

PS Ratio

PEP:

2.07

UBER:

2.70

PB Ratio

PEP:

9.25

UBER:

5.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

PEP:

$95.45B

UBER:

$53.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PEP:

$51.60B

UBER:

$22.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

PEP:

$15.08B

UBER:

$5.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEP vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEP
PEP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEP vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEPUBERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.92

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

-0.62

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

-1.09

+3.20

PEP vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEP Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEP and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEP vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEP drawdown since its inception was -73.92%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEP and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEPUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.92%

-68.05%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.25%

-31.46%

+15.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.17%

-31.46%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.32%

-60.45%

+30.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.75%

-31.22%

+13.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-25.67%

+12.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.37%

17.93%

-11.56%

Volatility

PEP vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) is 5.39%, while Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that PEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEPUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

7.96%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

23.21%

-8.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.71%

32.66%

-10.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

44.82%

-26.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

50.61%

-30.94%

Dividends

PEP vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, while UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
3.98%3.92%3.51%2.91%2.50%2.45%2.71%2.77%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PEP vs. UBER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PepsiCo, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
19.44B
13.20B
(PEP) Total Revenue
(UBER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PEP vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PepsiCo, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
55.2%
45.0%
Portfolio components
PEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.73B and revenue of 19.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

PEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.21B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

PEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PEP and UBER have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBER has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to PEP (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEP dropped -73.92% vs UBER's -68.05%.

PEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEP and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer