PEP vs. CSW
PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) and CSW (CSW Industrials Inc) are both stocks. PEP operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while CSW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past year, PEP returned 16.19% vs -5.19% for CSW. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PEP vs. CSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEP achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly higher than CSW's -6.92% return.
PEP
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- 1Y
- 16.19%
- 3Y*
- -4.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 6.75%
CSW
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- -6.92%
- 6M
- -13.70%
- 1Y
- -5.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEP vs. CSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 3.89% | 12.54% |
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | -6.92% | -4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEP and CSW is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
PEP:
$200.51B
CSW:
$4.56B
PEP:
$6.38
CSW:
$6.68
PEP:
22.94
CSW:
40.79
PEP:
7.94
CSW:
2.65
PEP:
2.10
CSW:
4.22
PEP:
9.38
CSW:
4.34
PEP:
$95.45B
CSW:
$1.08B
PEP:
$51.60B
CSW:
$453.68M
PEP:
$15.08B
CSW:
$211.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEP vs. CSW — Risk / Return Rank
PEP
CSW
PEP vs. CSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and CSW Industrials Inc (CSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEP | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.01 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.21 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.53 | -0.35 | +2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEP vs. CSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEP drawdown since its inception was -73.92%, which is greater than CSW's maximum drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEP and CSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEP | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.92% | -25.35% | -48.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.25% | -24.56% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.62% | -18.49% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.65% | -13.88% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.41% | 14.93% | -8.52% |
Volatility
PEP vs. CSW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) is 5.57%, while CSW Industrials Inc (CSW) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that PEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEP | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 12.20% | -6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.67% | 30.57% | -15.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.69% | 40.35% | -18.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 40.29% | -21.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 40.29% | -20.61% |
Dividends
PEP vs. CSW - Dividend Comparison
PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than CSW's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | 0.41% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 3.93% | 3.92% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% |
Financials
PEP vs. CSW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PepsiCo, Inc. and CSW Industrials Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PEP vs. CSW - Profitability Comparison
PEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.73B and revenue of 19.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.
CSW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a gross profit of 126.61M and revenue of 308.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
PEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.21B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
CSW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported an operating income of 37.44M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
PEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.
CSW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PEP and CSW have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSW has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to PEP (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEP dropped -73.92% vs CSW's -25.35%.
PEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEP and CSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer