PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMYX vs. FCEEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEMYX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PEMYX having a 20.03% return and FCEEX slightly lower at 19.99%.


PEMYX

1D
2.17%
1M
-1.99%
6M
9.84%
YTD
20.03%
1Y
38.28%
3Y*
23.38%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
10.89%
ALL TIME*
7.16%

FCEEX

1D
1.78%
1M
-0.67%
6M
10.28%
YTD
19.99%
1Y
38.36%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PEMYX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PEMYX
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
20.03%33.48%16.22%12.16%-27.42%-3.85%37.11%11.58%
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
19.99%34.81%10.51%12.52%-16.96%-1.29%10.19%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMYX and FCEEX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.91

The correlation between PEMYX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEMYX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEMYX
PEMYX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PEMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FCEEX
FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEMYX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEMYXFCEEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.72

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.32

8.58

-0.25

PEMYX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMYX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEMYX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMYX drawdown since its inception was -45.25%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMYX and FCEEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMYXFCEEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.25%

-34.68%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

-13.53%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-15.47%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-30.92%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.25%

-8.25%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-11.13%

-5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

4.28%

+0.10%

Volatility

PEMYX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) have volatilities of 10.16% and 9.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEMYXFCEEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.16%

9.70%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

20.64%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.37%

22.74%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

17.96%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

19.00%

-0.57%

PEMYX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMYX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEMYX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

PEMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than FCEEX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
3.55%3.29%4.17%4.36%4.08%3.38%2.98%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEMYX
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.65%0.78%1.85%0.99%0.00%5.27%1.78%1.40%2.16%0.24%1.18%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PEMYX and FCEEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PEMYX has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to FCEEX (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMYX dropped -45.25% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

FCEEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEMYX and FCEEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer