PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMX vs. PVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PEMX vs. PVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PEMX vs. PVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
10.51%34.01%17.21%15.13%
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
2.19%24.13%19.30%15.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than PVAL's 2.19% return.


PEMX

1D
1.36%
1M
-6.72%
YTD
10.51%
6M
20.10%
1Y
51.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PVAL

1D
0.37%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
2.19%
6M
9.24%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PEMX vs. PVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PVAL's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PEMX vs. PVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMX
PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PVAL
PVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMX vs. PVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEMXPVALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

1.49

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

2.06

+1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.32

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

1.98

+1.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.76

8.77

+5.98

PEMX vs. PVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the PVAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMX and PVAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEMXPVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.49

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.96

+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between PEMX and PVAL is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PEMX vs. PVAL - Dividend Comparison

PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than PVAL's 0.98% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
6.34%7.00%5.00%0.72%0.00%0.00%
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
0.98%1.00%1.34%1.33%0.59%0.47%

Drawdowns

PEMX vs. PVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum PVAL drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and PVAL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMXPVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-16.64%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.45%

-11.94%

-2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.73%

-4.98%

-4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-3.10%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.70%

+0.83%

Volatility

PEMX vs. PVAL - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) at 4.44%. This indicates that PEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PEMXPVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.37%

4.44%

+5.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

8.51%

+7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.51%

16.11%

+4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

15.38%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

15.38%

+1.79%