PEMX vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Putnam, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

PEMX vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 37.04% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 268.21% return.

PEMX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 8.00%
• YTD: 37.04%
• 6M: 41.88%
• 1Y: 68.11%
• 3Y*: 32.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 57.23%
• YTD: 268.21%
• 6M: 315.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEMX vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	37.04%	12.31%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	268.21%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMX and LRCU is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

PEMX vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMX

PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 89
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMX vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEMX	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.36	—	—

Drawdowns

PEMX vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEMX	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.91%	-40.09%	+25.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.98%	0.00%	-2.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.86%	-9.34%	+6.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PEMX	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.64%	113.97%	-90.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.94%	113.97%	-95.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	113.97%	-95.03%

PEMX vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEMX vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	5.11%	7.00%	5.00%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEMX and LRCU in my portfolio?

PEMX and LRCU have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PEMX or LRCU?

On fees, PEMX is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEMX or LRCU?

PEMX is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEMX or LRCU?

PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between PEMX and LRCU?

PEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 1.30% for LRCU.