PEMX vs. DIEM
PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. PEMX is actively managed, while DIEM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEMX returned 34.40%/yr vs 27.91%/yr for DIEM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PEMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DIEM.
Performance
PEMX vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 38.90% return, which is significantly higher than DIEM's 31.36% return.
PEMX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 7.45%
- YTD
- 38.90%
- 6M
- 44.55%
- 1Y
- 72.01%
- 3Y*
- 34.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIEM
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 8.55%
- YTD
- 31.36%
- 6M
- 33.96%
- 1Y
- 57.28%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
PEMX vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 38.90% | 34.01% | 17.21% | 15.13% |
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 31.36% | 30.81% | 12.29% | 9.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEMX and DIEM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between PEMX and DIEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEMX vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEMX
DIEM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
PEMX
DIEM
Financial Services
PEMX
DIEM
Industrials
PEMX
DIEM
Communication Services
PEMX
DIEM
Utilities
PEMX
DIEM
Consumer Cyclical
PEMX
DIEM
Basic Materials
PEMX
DIEM
Healthcare
PEMX
DIEM
Consumer Defensive
PEMX
DIEM
Real Estate
PEMX
DIEM
Energy
PEMX
-
DIEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEMX vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank
PEMX
DIEM
PEMX vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEMX | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.59 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 4.67 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.75 | 19.22 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEMX | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36 | 3.16 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.96 | 0.54 | +1.42 |
Drawdowns
PEMX vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and DIEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEMX | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -38.61% | +23.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.45% | -12.33% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.91% | -16.82% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -2.43% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -9.71% | +6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.99% | +0.67% |
Volatility
PEMX vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) at 8.50%. This indicates that PEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEMX | DIEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 8.50% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 15.97% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.54% | 18.21% | +3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 16.93% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 17.59% | +0.59% |
PEMX vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEMX vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison
PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than DIEM's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.32% | 2.99% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 6.31% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 5.98% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 0.35% |
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 5.04% | 7.00% | 5.00% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, PEMX and DIEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PEMX has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to DIEM (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -14.91% vs DIEM's -38.61%.
On 3-year performance, PEMX leads with 34.40% vs 27.91% for DIEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DIEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 34.40% return vs 27.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.
PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 2.32% for DIEM.
They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.19% for DIEM.
PEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEMX and DIEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer