PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMX vs. DIEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEMX vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 38.90% return, which is significantly higher than DIEM's 31.36% return.


PEMX

1D
-1.04%
1M
7.45%
YTD
38.90%
6M
44.55%
1Y
72.01%
3Y*
34.40%
5Y*
10Y*

DIEM

1D
-1.07%
1M
8.55%
YTD
31.36%
6M
33.96%
1Y
57.28%
3Y*
27.91%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEMX vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
38.90%34.01%17.21%15.13%
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
31.36%30.81%12.29%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMX and DIEM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023

0.83

The correlation between PEMX and DIEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEMX vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEMX
DIEM

Technology

45.0%
40.3%

Financial Services

24.4%
23.3%

Industrials

8.6%
4.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
5.6%

Utilities

4.5%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
6.7%

Basic Materials

2.8%
4.2%

Healthcare

1.9%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.6%

Energy

-

6.0%

Technology

PEMX
45.0%
DIEM
40.3%

Financial Services

PEMX
24.4%
DIEM
23.3%

Industrials

PEMX
8.6%
DIEM
4.7%

Communication Services

PEMX
6.6%
DIEM
5.6%

Utilities

PEMX
4.5%
DIEM
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PEMX
4.2%
DIEM
6.7%

Basic Materials

PEMX
2.8%
DIEM
4.2%

Healthcare

PEMX
1.9%
DIEM
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

PEMX
1.2%
DIEM
2.9%

Real Estate

PEMX
0.9%
DIEM
1.6%

Energy

PEMX

-

DIEM
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEMX vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMX
PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMX vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEMXDIEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.59

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

4.67

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.75

19.22

+0.53

PEMX vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is comparable to the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMX and DIEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEMXDIEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36

3.16

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.96

0.54

+1.42

Drawdowns

PEMX vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and DIEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMXDIEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-38.61%

+23.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.45%

-12.33%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-16.82%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-2.43%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-9.71%

+6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

2.99%

+0.67%

Volatility

PEMX vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) at 8.50%. This indicates that PEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEMXDIEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

8.50%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

15.97%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

18.21%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

16.93%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

17.59%

+0.59%

PEMX vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEMX vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than DIEM's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.32%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
5.04%7.00%5.00%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PEMX and DIEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PEMX has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to DIEM (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -14.91% vs DIEM's -38.61%.

On 3-year performance, PEMX leads with 34.40% vs 27.91% for DIEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DIEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 34.40% return vs 27.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.

PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 2.32% for DIEM.

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.19% for DIEM.

PEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEMX and DIEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer