PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMGX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEMGX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMGX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than PTDIX's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, PEMGX has outperformed PTDIX with an annualized return of 12.40%, while PTDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.95% annualized return.


PEMGX

1D
0.37%
1M
2.69%
YTD
-6.16%
6M
-7.75%
1Y
-8.82%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
12.40%

PTDIX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
5.94%
6M
5.16%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEMGX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEMGX
Principal MidCap Fund Class A
-6.16%1.39%23.50%25.60%-23.35%24.87%17.95%49.15%-7.10%24.93%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
5.94%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%16.04%24.91%-7.95%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMGX and PTDIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2001

0.92

The correlation between PEMGX and PTDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEMGX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMGX
PEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMGX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEMGXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.27

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

2.10

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

9.09

-9.95

PEMGX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMGX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEMGX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMGX drawdown since its inception was -84.41%, which is greater than PTDIX's maximum drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMGX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMGXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.41%

-54.38%

-30.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.38%

-7.32%

-12.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-13.05%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

-25.43%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.58%

-30.02%

-10.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.36%

-1.73%

-10.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.24%

-7.48%

-25.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.35%

1.69%

+7.66%

Volatility

PEMGX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) at 4.13%. This indicates that PEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEMGXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.13%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

8.62%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

10.39%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

13.59%

+5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

13.80%

+5.34%

PEMGX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEMGX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

PEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than PTDIX's 9.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEMGX
Principal MidCap Fund Class A
6.51%6.11%6.55%2.58%3.31%8.24%1.12%9.02%12.48%3.32%2.25%6.28%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.25%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEMGX and PTDIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEMGX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to PTDIX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMGX dropped -84.41% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

PTDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEMGX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer