PEMGX vs. DSMFX
PEMGX (Principal MidCap Fund Class A) and DSMFX (Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PEMGX returned 5.15%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for DSMFX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PEMGX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for DSMFX.
Performance
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEMGX achieves a -3.31% return, which is significantly lower than DSMFX's 18.17% return.
PEMGX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- 6M
- -6.10%
- YTD
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- -7.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
DSMFX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- —
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMGX Principal MidCap Fund Class A | -3.31% | 1.39% | 23.50% | 25.60% | -23.35% | 24.87% | 17.95% | 49.15% | -7.10% | 15.62% |
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 18.17% | 13.94% | 14.72% | 11.61% | -19.89% | 26.65% | 23.63% | 30.82% | -7.68% | 12.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEMGX and DSMFX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PEMGX and DSMFX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEMGX vs. DSMFX — Risk / Return Rank
PEMGX
DSMFX
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEMGX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.33 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 3.69 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 14.10 | -14.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEMGX drawdown since its inception was -84.41%, which is greater than DSMFX's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMGX and DSMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEMGX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.41% | -42.52% | -41.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.38% | -9.75% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.38% | -27.39% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -30.72% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.70% | -3.92% | -5.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.20% | -8.67% | -24.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.69% | 2.52% | +7.17% |
Volatility
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) is 3.93%, while Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that PEMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEMGX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 4.59% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 14.22% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.76% | 18.42% | -3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 21.06% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 21.84% | -2.73% |
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEMGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than DSMFX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Dividend Comparison
PEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than DSMFX's 6.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 6.04% | 7.13% | 7.71% | 0.26% | 3.57% | 27.39% | 2.06% | 4.05% | 5.96% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEMGX Principal MidCap Fund Class A | 6.32% | 6.11% | 6.55% | 2.58% | 3.31% | 8.24% | 1.12% | 9.02% | 12.48% | 3.32% | 2.25% | 6.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEMGX and DSMFX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSMFX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to PEMGX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMGX dropped -84.41% vs DSMFX's -42.52%.
DSMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEMGX and DSMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer