PEMGX vs. DSMFX
PEMGX (Principal MidCap Fund Class A) and DSMFX (Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PEMGX returned 4.39%/yr vs 8.31%/yr for DSMFX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PEMGX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for DSMFX.
Performance
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEMGX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than DSMFX's 21.80% return.
PEMGX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -7.75%
- 1Y
- -8.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
DSMFX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 21.80%
- 6M
- 19.38%
- 1Y
- 40.56%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMGX Principal MidCap Fund Class A | -6.16% | 1.39% | 23.50% | 25.60% | -23.35% | 24.87% | 17.95% | 49.15% | -7.10% | 15.62% |
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 21.80% | 13.94% | 14.72% | 11.61% | -19.89% | 26.65% | 23.63% | 30.82% | -7.68% | 12.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEMGX and DSMFX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PEMGX and DSMFX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEMGX vs. DSMFX — Risk / Return Rank
PEMGX
DSMFX
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) and Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEMGX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.41 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 4.53 | -4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 17.81 | -18.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEMGX drawdown since its inception was -84.41%, which is greater than DSMFX's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMGX and DSMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEMGX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.41% | -42.52% | -41.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.38% | -9.75% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.38% | -27.39% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -30.72% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.36% | -0.17% | -12.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.24% | -8.71% | -24.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.35% | 2.45% | +6.90% |
Volatility
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap Fund Class A (PEMGX) is 4.43%, while Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (DSMFX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that PEMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEMGX | DSMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 6.51% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 14.23% | -2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 18.37% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 21.08% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 21.88% | -2.74% |
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEMGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than DSMFX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEMGX vs. DSMFX - Dividend Comparison
PEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than DSMFX's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSMFX Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund | 5.86% | 7.13% | 7.71% | 0.26% | 3.57% | 27.39% | 2.06% | 4.05% | 5.96% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEMGX Principal MidCap Fund Class A | 6.51% | 6.11% | 6.55% | 2.58% | 3.31% | 8.24% | 1.12% | 9.02% | 12.48% | 3.32% | 2.25% | 6.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEMGX and DSMFX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSMFX has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to PEMGX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMGX dropped -84.41% vs DSMFX's -42.52%.
DSMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEMGX and DSMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer