PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PELAX vs. PYCEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PELAX vs. PYCEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A (PELAX) and Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PELAX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than PYCEX's 1.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PELAX having a 4.27% annualized return and PYCEX not far behind at 4.20%.


PELAX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.84%
YTD
1.43%
6M
2.79%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
4.27%

PYCEX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.56%
1Y
7.98%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
4.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PELAX vs. PYCEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PELAX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A
1.43%22.47%-1.15%15.23%-7.64%-8.12%1.76%16.76%-7.87%14.98%
PYCEX
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
1.98%7.96%7.90%7.37%-11.02%0.80%8.17%11.90%-3.33%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PELAX and PYCEX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.44

The correlation between PELAX and PYCEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PELAX vs. PYCEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PELAX
PELAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PELAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PELAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PELAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PELAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PELAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

PYCEX
PYCEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PYCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PYCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PELAX vs. PYCEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A (PELAX) and Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PELAXPYCEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

2.06

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.39

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

14.75

-8.85

PELAX vs. PYCEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PELAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the PYCEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PELAX and PYCEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PELAXPYCEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

3.94

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.81

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.18

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.24

-0.99

Drawdowns

PELAX vs. PYCEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PELAX drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, which is greater than PYCEX's maximum drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PELAX and PYCEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PELAXPYCEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.92%

-20.12%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-2.37%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.55%

-3.15%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.34%

-20.12%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.94%

-20.12%

-4.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

0.00%

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-3.00%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

0.54%

+1.58%

Volatility

PELAX vs. PYCEX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A (PELAX) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) at 0.64%. This indicates that PELAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYCEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PELAXPYCEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

0.64%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

1.59%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.09%

2.03%

+5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.04%

3.23%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.90%

3.58%

+5.32%

PELAX vs. PYCEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PELAX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PYCEX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PELAX vs. PYCEX - Dividend Comparison

PELAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than PYCEX's 6.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PELAX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class A
6.66%6.33%6.67%4.89%2.93%4.92%4.50%5.76%6.44%5.45%5.24%4.99%
PYCEX
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
6.33%6.50%6.21%5.59%4.92%5.23%4.00%4.81%5.13%4.84%4.18%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PELAX and PYCEX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PELAX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to PYCEX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PELAX dropped -36.92% vs PYCEX's -20.12%.

PYCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PELAX and PYCEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer