PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEGZX vs. FLMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEGZX vs. FLMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PEGZX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEGZX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than FLMVX's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PEGZX has outperformed FLMVX with an annualized return of 15.09%, while FLMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.


PEGZX

1D
0.70%
1M
3.39%
YTD
3.60%
6M
0.66%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
15.09%

FLMVX

1D
0.62%
1M
0.82%
YTD
7.40%
6M
7.73%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEGZX vs. FLMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEGZX
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund
3.60%-2.39%11.98%20.63%-23.79%11.59%42.90%112.92%-8.31%22.63%
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
7.40%5.17%27.75%11.38%-8.11%29.89%0.36%26.67%-11.66%13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PEGZX and FLMVX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 1997

0.78

The correlation between PEGZX and FLMVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEGZX vs. FLMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEGZX
PEGZX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PEGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PEGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FLMVX
FLMVX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FLMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEGZX vs. FLMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PEGZX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEGZXFLMVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

1.26

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.64

1.93

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.22

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

2.10

-1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.96

7.09

-6.12

PEGZX vs. FLMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEGZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the FLMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEGZX and FLMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEGZXFLMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

1.26

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.47

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.50

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.62

-0.17

Drawdowns

PEGZX vs. FLMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEGZX drawdown since its inception was -70.78%, which is greater than FLMVX's maximum drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEGZX and FLMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEGZXFLMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.78%

-54.72%

-16.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.25%

-7.19%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.71%

-15.91%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.37%

-25.59%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

-43.06%

+6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.57%

-0.67%

-5.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.29%

-6.45%

-10.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.21%

2.13%

+4.08%

Volatility

PEGZX vs. FLMVX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PEGZX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) at 2.70%. This indicates that PEGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEGZXFLMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

2.70%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

8.48%

+4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

11.99%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

19.36%

+2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.97%

20.44%

+7.53%

PEGZX vs. FLMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEGZX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than FLMVX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEGZX vs. FLMVX - Dividend Comparison

PEGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, less than FLMVX's 19.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
19.70%21.16%23.25%6.10%11.73%14.98%7.73%5.20%8.30%2.71%7.04%6.69%
PEGZX
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund
7.82%8.11%4.84%3.08%1.39%29.97%36.38%68.39%40.45%13.28%6.40%8.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEGZX and FLMVX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEGZX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to FLMVX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEGZX dropped -70.78% vs FLMVX's -54.72%.

FLMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEGZX and FLMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer