PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEBIX vs. PYELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEBIX vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEBIX achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than PYELX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PEBIX has outperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 4.63%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.90% annualized return.


PEBIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.76%
YTD
2.55%
6M
3.11%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
4.63%

PYELX

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.40%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEBIX vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEBIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund
2.55%15.48%7.83%11.48%-17.48%-2.00%6.56%14.91%-4.17%10.60%
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
0.59%19.79%-3.48%13.16%-11.28%-7.83%1.79%13.92%-8.16%15.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PEBIX and PYELX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.56

The correlation between PEBIX and PYELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEBIX vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEBIX
PEBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PEBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PEBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PYELX
PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEBIX vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEBIXPYELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.33

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.50

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

5.05

+9.57

PEBIX vs. PYELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEBIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the PYELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEBIX and PYELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEBIXPYELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

1.66

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.03

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.08

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.04

+0.85

Drawdowns

PEBIX vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEBIX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum PYELX drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEBIX and PYELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEBIXPYELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-56.98%

+21.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-7.22%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.31%

-50.49%

+44.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.10%

-51.98%

+23.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.10%

-52.62%

+24.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-3.18%

+2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-16.80%

+12.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.14%

-1.16%

Volatility

PEBIX vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PEBIX) is 1.70%, while Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that PEBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEBIXPYELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

2.21%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.76%

5.64%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68%

6.54%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

50.61%

-44.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.38%

36.36%

-29.98%

PEBIX vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEBIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEBIX vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison

PEBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, less than PYELX's 7.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEBIX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund
6.44%6.68%6.81%5.36%6.21%4.41%4.23%4.47%4.41%5.10%5.57%6.08%
PYELX
Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund
7.23%7.32%7.08%5.38%5.93%5.36%4.69%5.46%6.67%6.15%5.44%5.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEBIX and PYELX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYELX has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to PEBIX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEBIX dropped -35.49% vs PYELX's -56.98%.

PEBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEBIX and PYELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer