PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEB vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEB vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEB achieves a 64.62% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 11.43% return.


PEB

1D
1.42%
1M
25.98%
YTD
64.62%
6M
61.34%
1Y
96.90%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
-4.68%
10Y*
-1.11%

CGDV

1D
0.33%
1M
1.08%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.45%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEB vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PEB
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
64.62%-16.15%-14.96%19.68%-40.05%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
11.43%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PEB and CGDV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.57

The correlation between PEB and CGDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEB vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEB
PEB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEB vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEBCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.94

2.72

+3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

12.64

+1.98

PEB vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEB and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEB vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEB drawdown since its inception was -84.37%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEB and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEBCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.37%

-21.82%

-62.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.39%

-9.75%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.43%

-14.28%

-39.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.24%

-1.46%

-50.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.59%

-3.58%

-30.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.65%

2.09%

+4.56%

Volatility

PEB vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 4.64%. This indicates that PEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEBCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.28%

4.64%

+6.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.24%

9.90%

+14.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.38%

12.27%

+22.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.05%

15.57%

+23.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.75%

15.57%

+27.18%

Dividends

PEB vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

PEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than CGDV's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.17%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEB
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
0.21%0.35%0.30%0.25%0.30%0.18%0.21%5.67%5.37%4.09%5.11%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEB and CGDV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEB has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to CGDV (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEB dropped -84.37% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

PEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEB and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer