PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PE500.PA vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PE500.PA vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PE500.PA is traded in EUR, while IEMG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEMG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PE500.PA achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 26.40% return.


PE500.PA

1D
0.63%
1M
5.49%
YTD
10.83%
6M
11.25%
1Y
27.69%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*

IEMG

1D
-1.12%
1M
5.51%
YTD
26.40%
6M
27.77%
1Y
46.73%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PE500.PA vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PE500.PA
Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
10.83%3.89%32.77%21.94%-14.19%40.52%7.92%13.82%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
26.40%16.83%13.53%8.18%-15.02%6.79%8.15%14.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PE500.PA and IEMG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PE500.PA vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PE500.PA
PE500.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PE500.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PE500.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PE500.PA vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PE500.PAIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.48

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

4.44

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.05

16.21

-2.16

PE500.PA vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PE500.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PE500.PA and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PE500.PAIEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.59

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.50

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.40

+0.50

Drawdowns

PE500.PA vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PE500.PA drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, roughly equal to the maximum IEMG drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PE500.PA and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PE500.PAIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-34.49%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-10.58%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.69%

-17.88%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.69%

-22.55%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.17%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-9.17%

+4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.89%

-0.93%

Volatility

PE500.PA vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (PE500.PA) is 2.83%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that PE500.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PE500.PAIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

7.50%

-4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

15.44%

-7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

18.13%

-6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

16.66%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

19.18%

-2.20%

PE500.PA vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PE500.PA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PE500.PA vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

PE500.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.20%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
PE500.PA
Amundi ETF PEA S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PE500.PA and IEMG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PE500.PA.

PE500.PA is categorized as S&P 500, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. PE500.PA tracks S&P 500 ESG+ Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PE500.PA and 0.09% for IEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PE500.PA and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer