PDN vs. GWX
PDN (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF) and GWX (SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds - PDN tracks the FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small while GWX tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PDN returned 8.78%/yr vs 7.76%/yr for GWX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PDN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GWX.
Performance
PDN vs. GWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PDN having a 7.41% return and GWX slightly higher at 7.67%. Over the past 10 years, PDN has outperformed GWX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while GWX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.76% annualized return.
PDN
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
GWX
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 7.76%
PDN vs. GWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDN Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF | 7.41% | 38.34% | 0.57% | 13.35% | -17.35% | 9.03% | 10.65% | 19.17% | -18.38% | 30.74% |
GWX SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF | 7.67% | 35.89% | 0.21% | 10.94% | -19.98% | 9.66% | 13.41% | 18.18% | -18.97% | 28.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDN and GWX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PDN and GWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
PDN vs. GWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDN
GWX
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
PDN
GWX
Financial Services
PDN
GWX
Consumer Cyclical
PDN
GWX
Basic Materials
PDN
GWX
Technology
PDN
GWX
Real Estate
PDN
GWX
Healthcare
PDN
GWX
Consumer Defensive
PDN
GWX
Energy
PDN
GWX
Communication Services
PDN
GWX
Utilities
PDN
GWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDN vs. GWX — Risk / Return Rank
PDN
GWX
PDN vs. GWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDN | GWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.09 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | 7.72 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDN vs. GWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDN drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, smaller than the maximum GWX drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDN and GWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDN | GWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.32% | -63.25% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.26% | -11.91% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | -14.73% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.68% | -34.58% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.94% | -45.27% | +3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.11% | -6.44% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -14.71% | +3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 3.21% | -0.22% |
Volatility
PDN vs. GWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) is 5.67%, while SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that PDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDN | GWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 7.04% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 14.23% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 16.64% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 16.94% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 17.34% | -0.38% |
PDN vs. GWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GWX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDN vs. GWX - Dividend Comparison
PDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than GWX's 2.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWX SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF | 2.75% | 2.83% | 2.71% | 2.64% | 2.71% | 2.75% | 1.74% | 3.41% | 2.94% | 5.18% | 4.21% | 2.67% |
PDN Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF | 3.32% | 3.36% | 3.36% | 3.16% | 2.68% | 2.42% | 1.79% | 2.60% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 2.16% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PDN and GWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GWX has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to PDN (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDN dropped -59.32% vs GWX's -63.25%.
On 10-year performance, PDN leads with 8.78% vs 7.76% for GWX. On fees, GWX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PDN has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PDN has performed better with a 8.78% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GWX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PDN.
PDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.75% for GWX.
PDN tracks FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small, while GWX tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PDN and 0.40% for GWX.
GWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDN and GWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer