PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDN vs. DLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDN vs. DLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDN achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly higher than DLS's 8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PDN has outperformed DLS with an annualized return of 8.32%, while DLS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.


PDN

1D
-1.00%
1M
0.32%
6M
3.05%
YTD
9.46%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
8.32%
ALL TIME*
5.65%

DLS

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.24%
6M
3.30%
YTD
8.42%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
7.86%
ALL TIME*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.54M$1.48M$1.54M
$407.49K$457.49K$907.00K

PDN vs. DLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
9.46%38.34%0.57%13.35%-17.35%9.03%10.65%19.17%-18.38%30.74%
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund
8.42%34.11%3.06%15.33%-17.31%11.71%-1.28%22.20%-18.95%31.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PDN and DLS is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.88

The correlation between PDN and DLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDN vs. DLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDN
DLS

Industrials

2.5%
28.0%

Basic Materials

2.2%
9.0%

Technology

2.1%
9.1%

Energy

1.9%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
12.9%

Financial Services

1.4%
13.8%

Real Estate

1.2%
7.4%

Healthcare

1.0%
3.6%

Utilities

0.8%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
7.7%

Communication Services

0.3%
4.2%

Industrials

PDN
2.5%
DLS
28.0%

Basic Materials

PDN
2.2%
DLS
9.0%

Technology

PDN
2.1%
DLS
9.1%

Energy

PDN
1.9%
DLS
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PDN
1.5%
DLS
12.9%

Financial Services

PDN
1.4%
DLS
13.8%

Real Estate

PDN
1.2%
DLS
7.4%

Healthcare

PDN
1.0%
DLS
3.6%

Utilities

PDN
0.8%
DLS
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

PDN
0.6%
DLS
7.7%

Communication Services

PDN
0.3%
DLS
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDN vs. DLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDN
PDN Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDN vs. DLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDNDLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.69

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.69

5.71

+0.98

PDN vs. DLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDN Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the DLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDN and DLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDN vs. DLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDN drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, smaller than the maximum DLS drawdown of -63.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDN and DLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDNDLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.32%

-63.13%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-11.04%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-12.69%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

-32.22%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-44.77%

+2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-1.58%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-13.56%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.26%

-0.01%

Volatility

PDN vs. DLS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDNDLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.23%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

11.84%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

13.89%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

15.63%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.38%

+0.54%

PDN vs. DLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DLS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDN vs. DLS - Dividend Comparison

PDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than DLS's 3.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.51%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
3.26%3.36%3.36%3.16%2.68%2.42%1.79%2.60%2.21%2.42%2.16%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PDN and DLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PDN has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to DLS (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDN dropped -59.32% vs DLS's -63.13%.

On 10-year performance, PDN leads with 8.32% vs 7.86% for DLS. On fees, PDN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PDN has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PDN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DLS.

DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 3.26% for PDN.

PDN tracks FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small, while DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PDN and 0.58% for DLS.

PDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDN and DLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer