PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDN vs. DDLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDN vs. DDLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDN achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than DDLS's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PDN has underperformed DDLS with an annualized return of 8.78%, while DDLS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.67% annualized return.


PDN

1D
-2.19%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
7.41%
6M
7.22%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
8.78%

DDLS

1D
-1.41%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
4.43%
6M
5.16%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDN vs. DDLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
7.41%38.34%0.57%13.35%-17.35%9.03%10.65%19.17%-18.38%30.74%
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
4.43%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-16.92%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PDN and DDLS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016

0.83

The correlation between PDN and DDLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDN vs. DDLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDN
DDLS

Industrials

23.2%
25.1%

Financial Services

12.7%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
11.2%

Basic Materials

10.5%
8.0%

Technology

10.1%
7.8%

Real Estate

8.7%
6.3%

Healthcare

5.7%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
5.9%

Energy

4.8%
3.2%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.7%
2.0%

Industrials

PDN
23.2%
DDLS
25.1%

Financial Services

PDN
12.7%
DDLS
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PDN
11.7%
DDLS
11.2%

Basic Materials

PDN
10.5%
DDLS
8.0%

Technology

PDN
10.1%
DDLS
7.8%

Real Estate

PDN
8.7%
DDLS
6.3%

Healthcare

PDN
5.7%
DDLS
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

PDN
5.3%
DDLS
5.9%

Energy

PDN
4.8%
DDLS
3.2%

Communication Services

PDN
4.5%
DDLS
3.7%

Utilities

PDN
2.7%
DDLS
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDN vs. DDLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDN
PDN Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDN Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDN vs. DDLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDNDDLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.85

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

6.69

+0.76

PDN vs. DDLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDN Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the DDLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDN and DDLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDN vs. DDLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDN drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, which is greater than DDLS's maximum drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDN and DDLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDNDDLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.32%

-36.80%

-22.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-10.69%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-11.66%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

-19.87%

-13.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-36.80%

-5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-4.38%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.57%

-5.69%

-5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.95%

+0.04%

Volatility

PDN vs. DDLS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) at 4.47%. This indicates that PDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDNDDLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

4.47%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

11.14%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

13.31%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

13.82%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

15.59%

+1.37%

PDN vs. DDLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DDLS's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDN vs. DDLS - Dividend Comparison

PDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than DDLS's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.59%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%0.00%
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
3.32%3.36%3.36%3.16%2.68%2.42%1.79%2.60%2.21%2.42%2.16%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDN and DDLS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDN has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to DDLS (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDN dropped -59.32% vs DDLS's -36.80%.

On 10-year performance, DDLS leads with 9.67% vs 8.78% for PDN. On fees, DDLS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDLS has performed better with a 9.67% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDLS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PDN.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.32% for PDN.

PDN tracks FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small, while DDLS tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PDN and 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDN and DDLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer