PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDJGX vs. PJFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDJGX vs. PJFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Day One 2050 Fund (PDJGX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDJGX achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly higher than PJFAX's 9.23% return.


PDJGX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.46%
YTD
12.20%
6M
12.93%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*

PJFAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
7.66%
YTD
9.23%
6M
7.87%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
20.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDJGX vs. PJFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDJGX
Prudential Day One 2050 Fund
12.20%18.35%33.43%17.95%-15.32%19.33%11.29%23.82%-8.82%19.59%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
9.23%14.53%48.10%52.76%-37.89%15.65%55.66%45.04%-1.24%34.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PDJGX and PJFAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.79

The correlation between PDJGX and PJFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDJGX vs. PJFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDJGX
PDJGX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PDJGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDJGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDJGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PDJGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDJGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDJGX vs. PJFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Day One 2050 Fund (PDJGX) and PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDJGXPJFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.24

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.86

3.95

+9.91

PDJGX vs. PJFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDJGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the PJFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDJGX and PJFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDJGXPJFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.35

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.62

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.52

+0.26

Drawdowns

PDJGX vs. PJFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDJGX drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, smaller than the maximum PJFAX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDJGX and PJFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDJGXPJFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.11%

-64.07%

+30.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-17.76%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-24.05%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-43.56%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.63%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-20.35%

+14.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

5.55%

-3.62%

Volatility

PDJGX vs. PJFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Day One 2050 Fund (PDJGX) is 3.41%, while PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that PDJGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDJGXPJFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

3.85%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

12.34%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

16.27%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

24.70%

-7.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

24.01%

-7.23%

PDJGX vs. PJFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDJGX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDJGX vs. PJFAX - Dividend Comparison

PDJGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than PJFAX's 12.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDJGX
Prudential Day One 2050 Fund
3.81%4.27%34.20%3.81%8.60%11.14%1.96%4.52%4.89%2.18%0.00%0.00%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
12.28%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDJGX and PJFAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJFAX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to PDJGX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDJGX dropped -33.11% vs PJFAX's -64.07%.

PDJGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDJGX and PJFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer