PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDI vs. O
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PDI vs. O - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and Realty Income Corporation (O). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDI achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than O's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PDI has outperformed O with an annualized return of 7.55%, while O has yielded a comparatively lower 4.89% annualized return.


PDI

1D
-0.79%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
0.14%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
7.55%

O

1D
1.31%
1M
2.40%
YTD
13.70%
6M
11.57%
1Y
14.25%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
4.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDI vs. O - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
-0.81%11.03%17.18%11.99%-16.99%7.81%-9.96%22.23%7.35%18.59%
O
Realty Income Corporation
13.70%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PDI and O is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2012

0.22

The correlation between PDI and O shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PDI:

$3.86

O:

$1.17

PE Ratio

PDI:

4.23

O:

53.41

PEG Ratio

PDI:

0.06

O:

4.35

PS Ratio

PDI:

3.13

O:

7.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

PDI:

$2.03B

O:

$5.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PDI:

$1.51B

O:

$3.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

PDI:

$2.09B

O:

$3.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDI vs. O — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDI
PDI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDI vs. O - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and Realty Income Corporation (O). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.15

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

1.29

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

3.12

-3.09

PDI vs. O - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDI Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the O Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDI and O, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDI vs. O - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDI drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, roughly equal to the maximum O drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDI and O.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.47%

-48.45%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-11.10%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-26.49%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.19%

-34.48%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.47%

-48.28%

+1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.56%

-5.94%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-9.20%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

4.58%

+0.51%

Volatility

PDI vs. O - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) is 3.31%, while Realty Income Corporation (O) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that PDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than O based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

5.29%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

11.98%

-3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

16.21%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

18.92%

-3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

25.64%

-6.60%

Dividends

PDI vs. O - Dividend Comparison

PDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.24%, more than O's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.16%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
16.24%14.94%14.43%14.74%17.84%10.21%10.01%9.45%10.78%8.81%14.79%18.70%

Financials

PDI vs. O - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund and Realty Income Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B202120222023202420252026
615.21M
1.55B
(PDI) Total Revenue
(O) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PDI vs. O - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund and Realty Income Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
90.7%
0
Portfolio components
PDI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund reported a gross profit of 558.21M and revenue of 615.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.7%.

O - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PDI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund reported an operating income of 529.42M and revenue of 615.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 86.1%.

O - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PDI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund reported a net income of 457.73M and revenue of 615.21M, resulting in a net margin of 74.4%.

O - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a net income of -9.17M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of -0.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PDI and O have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

O has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to PDI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDI dropped -46.47% vs O's -48.45%.

O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDI and O

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer