PDHVX vs. VEMBX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PDHVX (PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund) and VEMBX (Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PDHVX returned 2.34%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for VEMBX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PDHVX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VEMBX.

Performance

PDHVX vs. VEMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund (PDHVX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares (VEMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDHVX achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than VEMBX's 2.14% return.

PDHVX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.63%
• 6M: 1.03%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 1Y: 9.45%
• 3Y*: 9.40%
• 5Y*: 2.34%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.74%

VEMBX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.12%
• 6M: 1.57%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 1Y: 8.80%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PDHVX PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VEMBX Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PDHVX vs. VEMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PDHVX PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund	1.99%	14.99%	7.14%	9.90%	-17.36%	-2.12%	4.37%	15.58%	-6.52%	0.16%
VEMBX Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares	2.14%	14.32%	7.38%	13.66%	-13.18%	-1.53%	14.99%	17.72%	-0.89%	0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PDHVX and VEMBX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017	0.87

The correlation between PDHVX and VEMBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PDHVX vs. VEMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDHVX

PDHVX Risk / Return Rank: 74
PDHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PDHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PDHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PDHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
PDHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

VEMBX

VEMBX Risk / Return Rank: 85
VEMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VEMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VEMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VEMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
VEMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDHVX vs. VEMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund (PDHVX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares (VEMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PDHVX	VEMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.13	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	3.38	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.42	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.43	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	10.42	-1.51

PDHVX vs. VEMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDHVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the VEMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDHVX and VEMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PDHVX vs. VEMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDHVX drawdown since its inception was -29.66%, which is greater than VEMBX's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDHVX and VEMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDHVX	VEMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.66%	-24.36%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.99%	-3.77%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.09%	-5.00%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.66%	-24.36%	-5.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	-1.36%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-3.82%	-3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	0.88%	+0.27%

Volatility

PDHVX vs. VEMBX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund (PDHVX) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares (VEMBX) at 1.00%. This indicates that PDHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDHVX	VEMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	1.00%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.38%	3.67%	+0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.22%	4.32%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.91%	6.38%	+0.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.77%	6.33%	+1.44%

PDHVX vs. VEMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDHVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMBX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDHVX vs. VEMBX - Dividend Comparison

PDHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than VEMBX's 5.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PDHVX PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund	6.41%	6.95%	8.80%	5.93%	8.88%	5.14%	4.76%	5.90%	5.96%	0.26%
VEMBX Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares	5.50%	6.20%	6.86%	7.06%	5.43%	5.00%	4.50%	6.27%	4.81%	6.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDHVX and VEMBX in my portfolio?

PDHVX and VEMBX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDHVX or VEMBX?

PDHVX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to VEMBX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDHVX dropped -29.66% vs VEMBX's -24.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.