PDHVX vs. GMCDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PDHVX (PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund) and GMCDX (GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PDHVX returned 2.71%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for GMCDX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PDHVX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for GMCDX.

Performance

PDHVX vs. GMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund (PDHVX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDHVX achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly lower than GMCDX's 9.50% return.

PDHVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 3.46%
• 6M: 4.15%
• 1Y: 14.65%
• 3Y*: 11.15%
• 5Y*: 2.71%
• 10Y*: —

GMCDX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 9.50%
• 6M: 9.69%
• 1Y: 26.42%
• 3Y*: 19.74%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: 7.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDHVX vs. GMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PDHVX PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund	3.46%	14.99%	7.14%	9.90%	-17.36%	-2.12%	4.37%	15.58%	-6.52%	0.16%
GMCDX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund	9.50%	22.34%	13.39%	17.63%	-16.30%	6.56%	7.25%	14.28%	-5.89%	0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PDHVX and GMCDX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017	0.84

The correlation between PDHVX and GMCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PDHVX vs. GMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDHVX

PDHVX Risk / Return Rank: 82
PDHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PDHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PDHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PDHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PDHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GMCDX

GMCDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
GMCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GMCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GMCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GMCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GMCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDHVX vs. GMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund (PDHVX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PDHVX	GMCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	4.97	-2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.47	8.90	-4.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	2.23	-0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	6.86	-3.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.04	29.70	-16.66

PDHVX vs. GMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDHVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is lower than the GMCDX Sharpe Ratio of 4.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDHVX and GMCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PDHVX vs. GMCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDHVX drawdown since its inception was -29.66%, smaller than the maximum GMCDX drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDHVX and GMCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDHVX	GMCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.66%	-68.24%	+38.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.99%	-3.85%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.04%	-9.00%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.66%	-26.02%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.20%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-17.63%	+10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	0.89%	+0.22%

Volatility

PDHVX vs. GMCDX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund (PDHVX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX) at 1.17%. This indicates that PDHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDHVX	GMCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.44%	1.17%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.35%	4.41%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.27%	5.31%	-0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.89%	11.21%	-4.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.81%	9.32%	-1.51%

PDHVX vs. GMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDHVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GMCDX's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDHVX vs. GMCDX - Dividend Comparison

PDHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%, more than GMCDX's 5.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMCDX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund	5.73%	6.27%	6.88%	10.26%	13.73%	17.75%	9.66%	6.60%	7.76%	7.06%	6.00%	2.50%
PDHVX PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund	6.80%	6.95%	8.80%	5.93%	8.88%	5.14%	4.76%	5.90%	5.96%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDHVX and GMCDX in my portfolio?

PDHVX and GMCDX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDHVX or GMCDX?

PDHVX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to GMCDX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDHVX dropped -29.66% vs GMCDX's -68.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.97 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.