PDHVX vs. PDBZX
PDHVX (PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund) and PDBZX (PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - PDHVX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while PDBZX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, PDHVX returned 2.34%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PDBZX. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PDHVX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PDBZX.
Performance
PDHVX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDHVX achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's -0.50% return.
PDHVX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 9.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.74%
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PDHVX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDHVX PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund | 1.99% | 14.99% | 7.14% | 9.90% | -17.36% | -2.12% | 4.37% | 15.58% | -6.52% | 0.16% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.50% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDHVX and PDBZX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PDHVX and PDBZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.70 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDHVX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
PDHVX
PDBZX
PDHVX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund (PDHVX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDHVX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 1.17 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.92 | 2.92 | +6.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDHVX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDHVX drawdown since its inception was -29.66%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDHVX and PDBZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDHVX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.66% | -20.88% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.99% | -3.00% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.09% | -4.85% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.66% | -20.75% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -2.49% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -2.30% | -5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 1.20% | -0.05% |
Volatility
PDHVX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund (PDHVX) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) at 1.01%. This indicates that PDHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDHVX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 1.01% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.38% | 3.45% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.22% | 4.22% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 6.05% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.77% | 5.38% | +2.39% |
PDHVX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDHVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDHVX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
PDHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than PDBZX's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.22% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
PDHVX PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency Fund | 6.41% | 6.95% | 8.80% | 5.93% | 8.88% | 5.14% | 4.76% | 5.90% | 5.96% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDHVX and PDBZX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDHVX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to PDBZX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDHVX dropped -29.66% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.
PDHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDHVX and PDBZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer