PDGZX vs. PSLDX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX).
PDGZX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014. PSLDX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Aug 31, 2007.
Performance
PDGZX vs. PSLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDGZX vs. PSLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDGZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund | -2.76% | 16.92% | 10.09% | 16.52% | -17.06% | 15.06% | 13.72% | 22.67% | -6.75% | 18.13% |
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I | -9.19% | 12.26% | 17.15% | 27.92% | -43.18% | 25.85% | 37.80% | 60.43% | -9.31% | 33.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDGZX achieves a -2.76% return, which is significantly higher than PSLDX's -9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PDGZX has underperformed PSLDX with an annualized return of 8.66%, while PSLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.36% annualized return.
PDGZX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 12.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
PSLDX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -13.68%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDGZX vs. PSLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDGZX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PSLDX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDGZX vs. PSLDX — Risk / Return Rank
PDGZX
PSLDX
PDGZX vs. PSLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDGZX | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.20 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 0.43 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.06 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.16 | +1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.29 | 0.49 | +5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDGZX | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.20 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.12 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.58 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.61 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDGZX and PSLDX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PDGZX vs. PSLDX - Dividend Comparison
PDGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than PSLDX's 3.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDGZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund | 5.39% | 5.09% | 4.17% | 2.73% | 3.30% | 4.92% | 2.12% | 3.71% | 5.84% | 2.17% | 2.72% | 2.40% |
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I | 3.40% | 5.60% | 16.73% | 3.67% | 2.66% | 38.80% | 12.89% | 18.91% | 15.58% | 24.52% | 11.55% | 12.08% |
Drawdowns
PDGZX vs. PSLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDGZX drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, smaller than the maximum PSLDX drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDGZX and PSLDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDGZX | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.25% | -55.25% | +28.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -19.25% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.26% | -49.32% | +25.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.25% | -49.32% | +22.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -18.47% | +11.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -10.70% | +6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 6.30% | -4.43% |
Volatility
PDGZX vs. PSLDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX) is 3.79%, while PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that PDGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDGZX | PSLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 7.50% | -3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.33% | 14.03% | -7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.27% | 23.99% | -12.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 22.86% | -11.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 21.31% | -9.16% |