PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDFEX vs. LTIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDFEX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Day One 2030 Fund (PDFEX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDFEX achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than LTIUX's 6.70% return.


PDFEX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.20%
YTD
7.09%
6M
7.12%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*

LTIUX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.36%
YTD
6.70%
6M
6.91%
1Y
17.03%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDFEX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDFEX
Prudential Day One 2030 Fund
7.09%12.11%19.96%12.14%-13.56%14.36%9.48%19.27%-6.04%15.13%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
6.70%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%23.48%-7.37%18.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PDFEX and LTIUX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.95

The correlation between PDFEX and LTIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDFEX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDFEX
PDFEX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PDFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PDFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDFEX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Day One 2030 Fund (PDFEX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDFEXLTIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.38

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.66

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

11.84

+2.25

PDFEX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDFEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the LTIUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDFEX and LTIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDFEXLTIUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.03

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.60

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.48

+0.37

Drawdowns

PDFEX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDFEX drawdown since its inception was -24.53%, smaller than the maximum LTIUX drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDFEX and LTIUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDFEXLTIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.53%

-49.65%

+25.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.27%

-6.57%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-11.08%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.63%

-24.23%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-6.71%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.47%

-0.35%

Volatility

PDFEX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Day One 2030 Fund (PDFEX) is 1.99%, while Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that PDFEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDFEXLTIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

2.62%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

6.96%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.43%

8.62%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.27%

11.83%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.68%

12.49%

-1.81%

PDFEX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDFEX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDFEX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

PDFEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than LTIUX's 8.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.46%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%
PDFEX
Prudential Day One 2030 Fund
3.63%3.89%22.09%3.74%8.84%8.52%1.89%5.02%4.15%1.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PDFEX and LTIUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTIUX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to PDFEX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDFEX dropped -24.53% vs LTIUX's -49.65%.

PDFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDFEX and LTIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer