PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDEZX vs. FPADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDEZX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDEZX achieves a 32.69% return, which is significantly higher than FPADX's 28.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PDEZX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 12.01%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.31% annualized return.


PDEZX

1D
-1.21%
1M
1.71%
YTD
32.69%
6M
33.58%
1Y
45.85%
3Y*
27.34%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
12.01%

FPADX

1D
-0.96%
1M
8.03%
YTD
28.80%
6M
31.68%
1Y
55.65%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDEZX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
32.69%14.88%18.48%16.12%-41.65%-0.86%72.88%30.33%-18.26%40.80%
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
28.80%33.90%6.80%9.51%-20.06%-3.07%17.84%18.28%-14.65%35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PDEZX and FPADX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2014

0.84

The correlation between PDEZX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDEZX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDEZX
PDEZX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PDEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PDEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FPADX
FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDEZX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDEZXFPADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.60

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

4.34

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

17.23

-5.33

PDEZX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDEZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDEZX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDEZXFPADXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

3.24

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.45

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.58

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.37

+0.04

Drawdowns

PDEZX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDEZX drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEZX and FPADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDEZXFPADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.95%

-39.16%

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-13.28%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

-16.09%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.88%

-37.00%

-15.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.95%

-39.16%

-15.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-0.96%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.22%

-13.26%

-6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

3.34%

+0.71%

Volatility

PDEZX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) has a higher volatility of 9.53% compared to Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) at 7.71%. This indicates that PDEZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDEZXFPADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.53%

7.71%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.90%

15.44%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.63%

17.83%

+5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.56%

17.11%

+6.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

17.82%

+4.42%

PDEZX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDEZX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDEZX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

PDEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than FPADX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPADX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund
1.83%2.35%2.70%2.68%2.47%2.14%1.50%2.59%2.20%0.12%1.69%2.47%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
1.66%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDEZX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDEZX has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to FPADX (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEZX dropped -54.95% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

FPADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDEZX and FPADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer