PDDL vs. TSDD
PDDL (GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PDDL returned -48.91% vs -46.78% for TSDD. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PDDL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
PDDL vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDDL achieves a -48.41% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's 47.87% return.
PDDL
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- 13.21%
- 6M
- -34.07%
- YTD
- -48.41%
- 1Y
- -48.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -42.28%
TSDD
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 44.87%
- 6M
- 39.90%
- YTD
- 47.87%
- 1Y
- -46.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -69.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $308.86K | $338.46K | $731.85K | |
| $166.67M | $161.08M | $200.09M |
PDDL vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PDDL GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF | -48.41% | 9.27% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 47.87% | -61.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDDL and TSDD is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDDL vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
PDDL
TSDD
PDDL vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (PDDL) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDDL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.97 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.65 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | -0.80 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDDL vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDDL drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDDL and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDDL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.06% | -99.03% | +22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.06% | -69.48% | -6.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.24% | -98.31% | +32.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -72.61% | +37.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.12% | 56.09% | -11.97% |
Volatility
PDDL vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (PDDL) is 15.94%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 37.07%. This indicates that PDDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDDL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.94% | 37.07% | -21.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.11% | 67.48% | -14.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.64% | 92.71% | -25.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.30% | 115.20% | -47.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.30% | 115.20% | -47.90% |
PDDL vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDDL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDDL vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
PDDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than TSDD's 5.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PDDL GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF | 0.65% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 5.70% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDDL and TSDD have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (37.07%) compared to PDDL (15.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDDL dropped -76.06% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, TSDD leads with -46.78% vs -48.91% for PDDL. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, PDDL has been the lower-risk option at 15.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSDD has performed better with a -46.78% return vs -48.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for PDDL.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 0.65% for PDDL.
PDDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for PDDL and 0.95% for TSDD.
TSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.49 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDDL and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer