PDDL vs. NVDL
PDDL (GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF) and NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDDL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDL.
Performance
PDDL vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDDL achieves a -49.84% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's 8.98% return.
PDDL
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -33.70%
- YTD
- -49.84%
- 6M
- -54.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDL
- 1D
- -12.37%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 71.27%
- 3Y*
- 105.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDDL vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PDDL GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF | -49.84% | 7.42% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 8.98% | 7.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDDL and NVDL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDDL vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank
PDDL
NVDL
PDDL vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (PDDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDDL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | 1.68 | -2.43 |
Drawdowns
PDDL vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDDL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDDL and NVDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDDL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.62% | -67.55% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.18% | -25.68% | -41.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -16.97% | -12.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.48% | — |
Volatility
PDDL vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDDL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.58% | 69.26% | -2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.58% | 90.61% | -24.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.58% | 90.61% | -24.03% |
PDDL vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDDL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDDL vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison
PDDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% |
PDDL GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF | 0.67% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDDL and NVDL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for PDDL.
PDDL has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for PDDL and 1.05% for NVDL.
Find the right allocation for PDDL and NVDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer