PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDD vs. TCEHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PDD vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDD achieves a -28.07% return, which is significantly lower than TCEHY's -21.95% return.


PDD

1D
0.32%
1M
-14.67%
YTD
-28.07%
6M
-27.15%
1Y
-18.91%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
-7.73%
10Y*

TCEHY

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.46%
YTD
-21.95%
6M
-23.21%
1Y
-7.81%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
-2.94%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDD vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PDD
Pinduoduo Inc.
-28.07%16.91%-33.71%79.41%39.88%-67.19%369.78%68.54%-15.32%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
-21.95%45.23%41.92%-5.48%-24.97%-18.69%50.09%21.93%-19.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PDD and TCEHY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.57

The correlation between PDD and TCEHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PDD:

$120.71B

TCEHY:

$541.76B

EPS

PDD:

CN¥64.39

TCEHY:

CN¥25.30

PE Ratio

PDD:

8.58

TCEHY:

15.81

PEG Ratio

PDD:

0.08

TCEHY:

1.97

PS Ratio

PDD:

1.86

TCEHY:

4.84

PB Ratio

PDD:

1.94

TCEHY:

3.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

PDD:

CN¥441.76B

TCEHY:

CN¥763.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PDD:

CN¥247.30B

TCEHY:

CN¥422.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

PDD:

CN¥134.30B

TCEHY:

CN¥324.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDD vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDD
PDD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TCEHY
TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDD vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDDTCEHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.97

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.25

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-0.52

-0.57

PDD vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDD and TCEHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDD vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDD drawdown since its inception was -87.41%, which is greater than TCEHY's maximum drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDD and TCEHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDDTCEHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.41%

-73.17%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.14%

-36.75%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.40%

-36.75%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.88%

-66.13%

-14.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.79%

-32.71%

-27.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-19.72%

-19.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.55%

17.42%

+2.13%

Volatility

PDD vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) has a higher volatility of 14.35% compared to Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) at 12.15%. This indicates that PDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDDTCEHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.35%

12.15%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.50%

24.73%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.48%

30.90%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.09%

43.23%

+24.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.37%

38.83%

+30.54%

Dividends

PDD vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

PDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDD
Pinduoduo Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TCEHY
Tencent Holdings Limited
1.15%0.76%0.82%6.67%4.15%0.35%0.19%0.23%0.26%0.29%0.51%0.21%

Financials

PDD vs. TCEHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pinduoduo Inc. and Tencent Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
105.59B
195.27B
(PDD) Total Revenue
(TCEHY) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

PDD vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Pinduoduo Inc. and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
55.9%
54.6%
Portfolio components
PDD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.98B and revenue of 105.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.58B and revenue of 195.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

PDD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported an operating income of 21.02B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 65.72B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

PDD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a net income of 12.47B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.74B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PDD and TCEHY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDD has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to TCEHY (12.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDD dropped -87.41% vs TCEHY's -73.17%.

TCEHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDD and TCEHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer