PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDC.TO achieves a 25.42% return, which is significantly higher than TLV.TO's 18.14% return. Over the past 10 years, PDC.TO has outperformed TLV.TO with an annualized return of 11.43%, while TLV.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.


PDC.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.24%
6M
22.87%
YTD
25.42%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
10.54%

TLV.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
1.41%
6M
18.39%
YTD
18.14%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
9.15%
ALL TIME*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$73.82KCA$71.46KCA$90.55K
CA$15.72KCA$17.13KCA$26.33K

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
25.42%21.80%16.38%6.97%-4.17%30.14%-5.48%25.00%-11.85%10.27%
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF
18.14%22.51%20.36%4.75%-10.22%21.67%-6.10%22.29%-6.62%10.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PDC.TO and TLV.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2012

0.63

The correlation between PDC.TO and TLV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDC.TO
TLV.TO

Financial Services

45.6%
24.4%

Energy

20.4%
7.5%

Utilities

14.2%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
4.5%

Communication Services

4.4%
6.6%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.6%

Real Estate

2.4%
26.2%

Industrials

1.1%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
8.1%

Technology

0.7%

-

Healthcare

-

1.7%

Financial Services

PDC.TO
45.6%
TLV.TO
24.4%

Energy

PDC.TO
20.4%
TLV.TO
7.5%

Utilities

PDC.TO
14.2%
TLV.TO
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PDC.TO
6.7%
TLV.TO
4.5%

Communication Services

PDC.TO
4.4%
TLV.TO
6.6%

Basic Materials

PDC.TO
3.7%
TLV.TO
1.6%

Real Estate

PDC.TO
2.4%
TLV.TO
26.2%

Industrials

PDC.TO
1.1%
TLV.TO
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

PDC.TO
0.8%
TLV.TO
8.1%

Technology

PDC.TO
0.7%
TLV.TO

-

Healthcare

PDC.TO

-

TLV.TO
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDC.TO
PDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TLV.TO
TLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDC.TOTLV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.78

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.99

7.23

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.59

33.01

+3.58

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.44, which is comparable to the TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDC.TO and TLV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, which is greater than TLV.TO's maximum drawdown of -37.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDC.TO and TLV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDC.TOTLV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.93%

-37.68%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.86%

-4.07%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.43%

-8.62%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-19.36%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.93%

-37.68%

-4.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-1.15%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-4.02%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.89%

+0.16%

Volatility

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) at 2.24%. This indicates that PDC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDC.TOTLV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.24%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.60%

6.13%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

7.67%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

9.97%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

12.68%

+2.60%

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDC.TO has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TLV.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDC.TO vs. TLV.TO - Dividend Comparison

PDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than TLV.TO's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
3.17%3.96%4.48%4.77%4.24%3.65%5.07%4.33%5.12%4.23%3.77%4.39%
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF
2.96%3.25%3.40%4.12%4.01%2.49%2.75%3.74%4.28%3.58%3.46%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDC.TO and TLV.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLV.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLV.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.

PDC.TO is categorized as Dividend, while TLV.TO is Canada Equities. PDC.TO tracks NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index, while TLV.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PDC.TO and 0.33% for TLV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDC.TO and TLV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer