PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) and FLVC.NEO (Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDC.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index, while FLVC.NEO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PDC.TO returned 38.86% vs 36.38% for FLVC.NEO. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PDC.TO charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLVC.NEO.

Performance

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDC.TO achieves a 25.42% return, which is significantly higher than FLVC.NEO's 21.78% return.

PDC.TO

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.24%
6M
22.87%
YTD
25.42%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
10.54%

FLVC.NEO

1D
0.33%
1M
3.35%
6M
23.34%
YTD
21.78%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
24.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

FLVC.NEO

Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
CA$134.83KCA$145.15KCA$488.47K

PDC.TO

Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
CA$73.82KCA$71.46KCA$90.55K

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF		25.42%21.80%12.89%
FLVC.NEO
Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF		21.78%21.15%13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PDC.TO and FLVC.NEO is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.52

The correlation between PDC.TO and FLVC.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
PDC.TO
FLVC.NEO

Financial Services

45.6%
43.0%

Energy

20.4%
8.8%

Utilities

14.2%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
7.0%

Communication Services

4.4%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Industrials

1.1%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
6.9%

Technology

0.7%
2.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

PDC.TO
45.6%
FLVC.NEO
43.0%

Energy

PDC.TO
20.4%
FLVC.NEO
8.8%

Utilities

PDC.TO
14.2%
FLVC.NEO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PDC.TO
6.7%
FLVC.NEO
7.0%

Communication Services

PDC.TO
4.4%
FLVC.NEO
7.5%

Basic Materials

PDC.TO
3.7%
FLVC.NEO
0.4%

Real Estate

PDC.TO
2.4%
FLVC.NEO

-

Industrials

PDC.TO
1.1%
FLVC.NEO
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

PDC.TO
0.8%
FLVC.NEO
6.9%

Technology

PDC.TO
0.7%
FLVC.NEO
2.0%

Healthcare

PDC.TO

-

FLVC.NEO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF

Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF

Often compared with PDC.TO:
PDC.TO vs. XDIV.TOPDC.TO vs. PDIV.TOPDC.TO vs. VDY.TOPDC.TO vs. RCD.TOPDC.TO vs. RBNK.TOPDC.TO vs. 3466.HKPDC.TO vs. XDV.TO
Often compared with FLVC.NEO:
FLVC.NEO vs. FCRI.TOFLVC.NEO vs. XCV.TOFLVC.NEO vs. FLVI.NEOFLVC.NEO vs. QCE.TOFLVC.NEO vs. CBNK.TOFLVC.NEO vs. DMEC.TOFLVC.NEO vs. FCMI.TO

Return for Risk

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
PDC.TO
PDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO
FLVC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

PDC.TOFLVC.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.44
5.06

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.75
7.66

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

2.02

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.99

12.45

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.59

55.03

-18.44

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.44, which is comparable to the FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 5.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDC.TO and FLVC.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, which is greater than FLVC.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDC.TO and FLVC.NEO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PDC.TOFLVC.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.93%

-7.89%

-34.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.86%

-3.21%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.43%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.93%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.50%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-0.80%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.71%

+0.34%

Volatility

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) have volatilities of 2.78% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PDC.TOFLVC.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.84%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.60%

5.74%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

7.91%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

11.38%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

11.38%

+3.90%

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDC.TO has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FLVC.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDC.TO vs. FLVC.NEO - Dividend Comparison

PDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than FLVC.NEO's 4.70% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLVC.NEO
Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF		4.70%4.96%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF		3.17%3.96%4.48%4.77%4.24%3.65%5.07%4.33%5.12%4.23%3.77%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

PDC.TO and FLVC.NEO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLVC.NEO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLVC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.

PDC.TO is categorized as Dividend, while FLVC.NEO is Canada Equities. PDC.TO tracks NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index, while FLVC.NEO tracks Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PDC.TO and 0.15% for FLVC.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDC.TO and FLVC.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer