PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBZX vs. HOBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDBZX vs. HOBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBZX achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than HOBIX's 2.43% return.


PDBZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.68%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.88%

HOBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.87%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDBZX vs. HOBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
0.72%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%
HOBIX
Holbrook Income Fund Class I
2.43%7.67%7.66%5.65%-2.91%6.13%7.45%7.70%1.74%2.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PDBZX and HOBIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.33

The correlation between PDBZX and HOBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDBZX vs. HOBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

HOBIX
HOBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HOBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
HOBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBZX vs. HOBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) and Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDBZXHOBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

5.19

-3.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

13.02

-10.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

45.38

-39.17

PDBZX vs. HOBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the HOBIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBZX and HOBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDBZXHOBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

3.31

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

1.64

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.85

+0.24

Drawdowns

PDBZX vs. HOBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBZX drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, smaller than the maximum HOBIX drawdown of -23.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBZX and HOBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBZXHOBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-23.52%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-0.51%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.51%

-2.77%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.81%

-4.16%

-16.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-0.97%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.15%

+0.86%

Volatility

PDBZX vs. HOBIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that PDBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDBZXHOBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

0.53%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

1.59%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

2.01%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

2.65%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

5.73%

-0.36%

PDBZX vs. HOBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDBZX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HOBIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDBZX vs. HOBIX - Dividend Comparison

PDBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than HOBIX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HOBIX
Holbrook Income Fund Class I
6.29%6.45%7.04%6.35%5.31%3.97%6.30%3.51%4.32%2.12%0.00%0.00%
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.57%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDBZX and HOBIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBZX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to HOBIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBZX dropped -20.88% vs HOBIX's -23.52%.

HOBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDBZX and HOBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer