PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBC vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDBC vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBC achieves a 24.08% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 16.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBC has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 7.69%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.48% annualized return.


PDBC

1D
0.12%
1M
-4.64%
6M
21.24%
YTD
24.08%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
7.69%

XOM

1D
1.03%
1M
-5.27%
6M
12.96%
YTD
16.96%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
22.21%
10Y*
8.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDBC vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
24.08%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-12.78%5.06%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
16.96%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PDBC and XOM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.53

The correlation between PDBC and XOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDBC vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBC vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDBCXOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.18

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.23

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

3.24

+3.01

PDBC vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBC Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBC and XOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDBC vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBC drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBC and XOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBCXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-62.40%

+12.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-20.11%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

-20.11%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

-20.51%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.73%

-61.34%

+20.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.06%

-18.46%

+5.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.11%

-10.22%

-12.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

7.65%

-3.01%

Volatility

PDBC vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) is 5.48%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that PDBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDBCXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

7.89%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

20.76%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

24.73%

-6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

26.71%

-7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

28.25%

-10.50%

Dividends

PDBC vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than XOM's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.09%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%0.00%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.94%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDBC and XOM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to PDBC (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBC dropped -49.52% vs XOM's -62.40%.

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDBC and XOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer