PDBC vs. VTV
PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. PDBC is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PDBC returned 7.99%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for VTV. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDBC charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
PDBC vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBC achieves a 28.75% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 14.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBC has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 7.99%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.
PDBC
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- 28.75%
- 6M
- 30.02%
- 1Y
- 30.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
PDBC vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 28.75% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 14.29% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBC and VTV is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.29 |
The correlation between PDBC and VTV shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDBC vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
PDBC
VTV
PDBC vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDBC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.47 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 4.25 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 16.04 | -6.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDBC vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBC drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBC and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.52% | -59.27% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -6.35% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.95% | -14.52% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -17.04% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.73% | -36.78% | -3.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.78% | 0.00% | -9.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.16% | -7.86% | -15.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 1.68% | +1.97% |
Volatility
PDBC vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.34%. This indicates that PDBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDBC | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 3.34% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.12% | 7.82% | +8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 10.38% | +8.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 13.92% | +5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 16.68% | +1.11% |
PDBC vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBC has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDBC vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than VTV's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.98% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDBC and VTV have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to VTV (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBC dropped -49.52% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.78% vs 7.99% for PDBC. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 1.83% for VTV.
PDBC is categorized as Commodities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PDBC and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDBC and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer