PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBC vs. BYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDBC vs. BYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBC achieves a 36.23% return, which is significantly higher than BYLD's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBC has outperformed BYLD with an annualized return of 8.79%, while BYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 3.01% annualized return.


PDBC

1D
0.39%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
36.23%
6M
36.27%
1Y
45.46%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
8.79%

BYLD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.35%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
3.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDBC vs. BYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
36.23%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-12.78%5.06%
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
1.23%8.41%4.17%8.30%-10.33%-1.25%4.25%12.79%-1.50%4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PDBC and BYLD is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.05

The correlation between PDBC and BYLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.36 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDBC vs. BYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BYLD
BYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBC vs. BYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDBCBYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.35

2.60

+3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

10.54

+2.85

PDBC vs. BYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the BYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBC and BYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDBCBYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.85

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.43

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.56

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.57

-0.34

Drawdowns

PDBC vs. BYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBC drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, which is greater than BYLD's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBC and BYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBCBYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-14.75%

-34.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-2.71%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.95%

-3.94%

-10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

-14.65%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.73%

-14.75%

-25.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-0.34%

-4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-2.51%

-20.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

0.67%

+2.74%

Volatility

PDBC vs. BYLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) at 1.42%. This indicates that PDBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDBCBYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

1.42%

+4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

2.94%

+12.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

3.82%

+14.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

5.20%

+13.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

5.43%

+12.35%

PDBC vs. BYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDBC has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BYLD's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDBC vs. BYLD - Dividend Comparison

PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than BYLD's 5.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
5.36%5.32%5.31%4.45%3.39%2.18%3.41%3.67%4.22%3.22%3.14%3.37%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.82%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDBC and BYLD have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBC has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to BYLD (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBC dropped -49.52% vs BYLD's -14.75%.

On 10-year performance, PDBC leads with 8.79% vs 3.01% for BYLD. On fees, BYLD is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BYLD is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.

BYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 2.82% for PDBC.

PDBC is categorized as Commodities, while BYLD is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PDBC and 0.17% for BYLD.

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDBC and BYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer