PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBC vs. BCIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PDBC vs. BCIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PDBC vs. BCIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
30.72%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%4.53%
BCIM
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF
0.00%10.71%3.30%-9.68%-3.29%4.17%

Returns By Period


PDBC

1D
-1.03%
1M
16.09%
YTD
30.72%
6M
33.97%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
9.86%

BCIM

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PDBC vs. BCIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDBC has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BCIM's 0.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PDBC vs. BCIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BCIM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBC vs. BCIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDBCBCIMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.48

PDBC vs. BCIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDBCBCIMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

Correlation

The correlation between PDBC and BCIM is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PDBC vs. BCIM - Dividend Comparison

PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than BCIM's 3.77% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.94%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%
BCIM
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF
3.77%3.77%11.47%3.36%0.72%1.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PDBC vs. BCIM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBCBCIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

Volatility

PDBC vs. BCIM - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PDBCBCIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%