PDBAX vs. PDBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX).
PDBAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 10, 1995. PDBZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 14, 1997.
Performance
PDBAX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDBAX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | -0.40% | 7.50% | 1.82% | 6.51% | -14.52% | -1.77% | 7.78% | 14.71% | -0.97% | 6.30% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.28% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 6.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBAX achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than PDBZX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBAX has underperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 2.55%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.95% annualized return.
PDBAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDBAX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDBAX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
PDBAX
PDBZX
PDBAX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBAX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.99 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.63 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 4.74 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBAX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.99 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.16 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.55 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBAX and PDBZX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PDBAX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
PDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than PDBZX's 4.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | 3.94% | 4.27% | 3.76% | 3.55% | 5.49% | 2.47% | 2.68% | 10.32% | 3.74% | 2.60% | 3.65% | 2.94% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.18% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
PDBAX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBAX drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, roughly equal to the maximum PDBZX drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBAX and PDBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBAX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -20.88% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -3.06% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -20.81% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.24% | -20.88% | -0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -2.27% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -2.31% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 1.06% | +0.01% |
Volatility
PDBAX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) is 1.61%, while PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a volatility of 1.71%. This indicates that PDBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDBAX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.71% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 2.71% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 4.59% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 6.00% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 5.34% | -0.02% |