PDBAX vs. FTBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX).
PDBAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 10, 1995. FTBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 15, 2002.
Performance
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | -0.65% | 7.50% | 1.82% | 6.51% | -14.52% | -1.77% | 7.78% | 14.71% | -0.97% | 6.30% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | -0.49% | 7.50% | 2.50% | 7.25% | -13.58% | -0.44% | 9.34% | 9.89% | -0.66% | 4.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBAX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than FTBFX's -0.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PDBAX having a 2.52% annualized return and FTBFX not far ahead at 2.58%.
PDBAX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
FTBFX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDBAX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank
PDBAX
FTBFX
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBAX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.10 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.57 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.86 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 5.73 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBAX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.10 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.15 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.55 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.93 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBAX and FTBFX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison
PDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than FTBFX's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | 3.95% | 4.27% | 3.76% | 3.55% | 5.49% | 2.47% | 2.68% | 10.32% | 3.74% | 2.60% | 3.65% | 2.94% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 4.02% | 4.36% | 4.51% | 4.15% | 2.54% | 1.89% | 5.22% | 3.03% | 3.19% | 2.97% | 3.61% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBAX drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBAX and FTBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBAX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -18.25% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -2.81% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -18.25% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.24% | -18.25% | -2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -2.35% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -2.31% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 0.91% | +0.15% |
Volatility
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.48%. This indicates that PDBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDBAX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 1.48% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 2.46% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 4.30% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 5.62% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 4.70% | +0.62% |