PDBAX vs. FTBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX).
PDBAX is managed by PGIM Investments. It was launched on Jan 10, 1995. FTBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 15, 2002.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PDBAX or FTBFX.
Key characteristics
| PDBAX | FTBFX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.37% | 4.00% |
| 1Y Return | 10.67% | 10.64% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.17% | -1.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.43% | 0.81% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.59% | 2.09% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.72 | 1.65 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.50 | 2.46 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.31 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.60 | 0.69 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.85 | 6.66 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.43% | 1.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.70% | 5.71% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.62% | -18.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.27% | -4.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBAX and FTBFX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PDBAX achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than FTBFX's 4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBAX has underperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 1.59%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.09% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison
PDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than FTBFX's 4.58% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | 4.47% | 4.32% | 4.83% | 2.69% | 2.69% | 3.34% | 3.75% | 2.63% | 2.60% | 2.93% | 3.33% | 3.50% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 4.58% | 4.15% | 3.34% | 2.19% | 2.53% | 2.95% | 3.19% | 2.74% | 2.95% | 3.71% | 2.99% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBAX drawdown since its inception was -20.62%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBAX and FTBFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PDBAX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) have volatilities of 1.59% and 1.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.