PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDBAX vs. AAIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDBAX vs. AAIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Ancora Income Fund (AAIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDBAX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than AAIIX's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBAX has underperformed AAIIX with an annualized return of 2.38%, while AAIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.01% annualized return.


PDBAX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.72%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
2.38%

AAIIX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.60%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
3.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDBAX vs. AAIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDBAX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund
0.20%7.50%1.82%6.51%-14.52%-1.77%7.78%14.71%-0.97%6.30%
AAIIX
Ancora Income Fund
1.53%2.28%9.23%9.46%-14.32%9.21%3.72%11.08%-5.60%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PDBAX and AAIIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2004

0.24

The correlation between PDBAX and AAIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDBAX vs. AAIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDBAX
PDBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PDBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

AAIIX
AAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDBAX vs. AAIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Ancora Income Fund (AAIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDBAXAAIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.30

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

3.98

+0.54

PDBAX vs. AAIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the AAIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDBAX and AAIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDBAX vs. AAIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDBAX drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, smaller than the maximum AAIIX drawdown of -98.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBAX and AAIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDBAXAAIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.24%

-98.01%

+76.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-4.19%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.99%

-98.01%

+92.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-98.01%

+77.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.24%

-98.01%

+76.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-97.80%

+95.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-12.53%

+10.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.37%

-0.26%

Volatility

PDBAX vs. AAIIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Ancora Income Fund (AAIIX) at 1.26%. This indicates that PDBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDBAXAAIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

1.26%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

3.38%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

4.58%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

2,046.08%

-2,040.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

1,446.22%

-1,440.86%

PDBAX vs. AAIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDBAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than AAIIX's 2.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDBAX vs. AAIIX - Dividend Comparison

PDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than AAIIX's 5.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAIIX
Ancora Income Fund
5.24%4.09%4.57%4.77%4.52%4.46%5.68%3.96%4.36%5.69%6.40%6.99%
PDBAX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund
4.32%4.27%3.76%3.55%5.49%2.47%2.68%10.32%3.74%2.60%3.65%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDBAX and AAIIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBAX has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to AAIIX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBAX dropped -21.24% vs AAIIX's -98.01%.

AAIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDBAX and AAIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer