PDBA vs. SPHD
PDBA (Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDBA is a Agricultural Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. PDBA is actively managed, while SPHD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PDBA returned 13.50%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for SPHD. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDBA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
PDBA vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBA achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return.
PDBA
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
PDBA vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 5.38% | -0.76% | 34.16% | 7.83% | -1.60% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.38% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 1.32% | -2.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBA and SPHD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDBA vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
PDBA
SPHD
PDBA vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBA | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.13 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 1.11 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 2.78 | -1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBA | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.74 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.58 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
PDBA vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBA drawdown since its inception was -12.45%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBA and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBA | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -41.39% | +28.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -7.33% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.45% | -13.29% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -5.37% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -4.70% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 2.93% | +1.21% |
Volatility
PDBA vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that PDBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDBA | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 2.99% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.51% | 7.55% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.77% | 11.04% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 14.16% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 17.64% | -4.35% |
PDBA vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDBA vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
PDBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.15% | 3.32% | 13.01% | 6.82% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.62% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDBA and SPHD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBA has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBA dropped -12.45% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 3-year performance, PDBA leads with 13.50% vs 11.42% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PDBA has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PDBA.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 3.15% for PDBA.
PDBA is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while SPHD is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PDBA and 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDBA and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer