PDBA vs. PPA
PDBA (Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDBA is a Agricultural Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. PDBA is actively managed, while PPA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PDBA returned 13.50%/yr vs 28.92%/yr for PPA. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDBA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPA.
Performance
PDBA vs. PPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBA achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 8.54% return.
PDBA
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPA
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 26.57%
- 3Y*
- 28.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
PDBA vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 5.38% | -0.76% | 34.16% | 7.83% | -1.60% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.54% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 5.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBA and PPA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDBA vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank
PDBA
PPA
PDBA vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBA | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.24 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 1.95 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 5.68 | -4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBA | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 1.40 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.66 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
PDBA vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBA drawdown since its inception was -12.45%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBA and PPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBA | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -57.37% | +44.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -13.71% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.45% | -15.24% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -8.40% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -9.18% | +5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 4.69% | -0.55% |
Volatility
PDBA vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) is 4.05%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that PDBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDBA | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 6.73% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.51% | 15.95% | -9.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.77% | 19.03% | -8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 18.49% | -5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 20.64% | -7.35% |
PDBA vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDBA vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison
PDBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than PPA's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.15% | 3.32% | 13.01% | 6.82% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.39% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDBA and PPA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPA has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to PDBA (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBA dropped -12.45% vs PPA's -57.37%.
On 3-year performance, PPA leads with 28.92% vs 13.50% for PDBA. On fees, PPA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PDBA has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PPA has performed better with a 28.92% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PDBA.
PDBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.39% for PPA.
PDBA is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PDBA and 0.58% for PPA.
PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDBA and PPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer