PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCY vs. VEMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCY vs. VEMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCY achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than VEMY's 5.89% return.


PCY

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.69%
YTD
2.20%
6M
1.58%
1Y
15.37%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
2.72%

VEMY

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.89%
6M
6.65%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCY vs. VEMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PCY
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
2.20%16.31%2.55%18.48%-3.82%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
5.89%15.27%13.48%14.45%-1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PCY and VEMY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022

0.81

The correlation between PCY and VEMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCY vs. VEMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCY
PCY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMY
VEMY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VEMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCY vs. VEMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCYVEMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.63

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

4.67

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

22.18

-11.58

PCY vs. VEMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCY Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the VEMY Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCY and VEMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCYVEMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

3.09

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.83

-1.53

Drawdowns

PCY vs. VEMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCY drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, which is greater than VEMY's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCY and VEMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCYVEMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.13%

-8.77%

-40.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.91%

-4.00%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.52%

-6.57%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.17%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-1.30%

-5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

0.84%

+0.61%

Volatility

PCY vs. VEMY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) at 1.60%. This indicates that PCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCYVEMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

1.60%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.81%

4.65%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.43%

6.05%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

7.63%

+5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

7.63%

+5.31%

PCY vs. VEMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than VEMY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCY vs. VEMY - Dividend Comparison

PCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than VEMY's 8.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCY
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
5.85%5.93%6.65%6.48%6.81%4.80%4.45%4.78%4.93%4.80%5.19%5.46%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
8.38%8.89%10.28%9.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCY and VEMY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCY has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to VEMY (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCY dropped -49.13% vs VEMY's -8.77%.

On 3-year performance, VEMY leads with 15.75% vs 11.35% for PCY. On fees, PCY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VEMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VEMY has performed better with a 15.75% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PCY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for VEMY.

VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.38%, compared with 5.85% for PCY.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PCY and 0.58% for VEMY.

VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCY and VEMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer