PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCY vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCY vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCY achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 8.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PCY has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 2.72%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.


PCY

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.69%
YTD
2.20%
6M
1.58%
1Y
15.37%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
2.72%

PPA

1D
-1.74%
1M
3.19%
YTD
8.54%
6M
13.46%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCY vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCY
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
2.20%16.31%2.55%18.48%-24.47%-4.30%2.29%17.66%-6.16%9.71%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.54%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PCY and PPA is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007

0.28

The correlation between PCY and PPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PCY vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PCY
PPA

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

90.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

9.8%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

PCY
0.0%
PPA

-

Basic Materials

PCY

-

PPA

-

Communication Services

PCY

-

PPA
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PCY

-

PPA

-

Consumer Defensive

PCY

-

PPA

-

Energy

PCY

-

PPA

-

Healthcare

PCY

-

PPA

-

Industrials

PCY

-

PPA
90.1%

Real Estate

PCY

-

PPA

-

Technology

PCY

-

PPA
9.8%

Utilities

PCY

-

PPA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCY vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCY
PCY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCY vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCYPPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.95

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

5.68

+4.92

PCY vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCY Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCY and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCYPPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.40

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.97

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.84

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.66

-0.36

Drawdowns

PCY vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCY drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCY and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCYPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.13%

-57.37%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.91%

-13.71%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.52%

-15.24%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-18.37%

-18.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.78%

-43.92%

+6.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-8.40%

+8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-9.18%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

4.69%

-3.24%

Volatility

PCY vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) is 2.30%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that PCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCYPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

6.73%

-4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.81%

15.95%

-10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.43%

19.03%

-11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

18.49%

-5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

20.64%

-7.70%

PCY vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCY vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

PCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than PPA's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCY
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
5.85%5.93%6.65%6.48%6.81%4.80%4.45%4.78%4.93%4.80%5.19%5.46%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.39%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCY and PPA have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to PCY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCY dropped -49.13% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.38% vs 2.72% for PCY. On fees, PCY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PCY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 2.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PCY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

PCY has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 0.39% for PPA.

PCY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. PCY tracks DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PCY and 0.58% for PPA.

PCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCY and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer