PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCY vs. EMCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCY vs. EMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCY achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly higher than EMCB's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PCY has underperformed EMCB with an annualized return of 2.71%, while EMCB has yielded a comparatively higher 4.18% annualized return.


PCY

1D
0.23%
1M
1.26%
YTD
2.44%
6M
2.10%
1Y
14.77%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.71%

EMCB

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.80%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
4.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCY vs. EMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCY
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
2.44%16.31%2.55%18.48%-24.47%-4.30%2.29%17.66%-6.16%9.71%
EMCB
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
1.87%8.19%7.11%8.76%-12.98%-0.62%8.60%13.43%-3.07%9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PCY and EMCB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2012

0.39

The correlation between PCY and EMCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (10 years) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PCY vs. EMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PCY
EMCB

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

PCY
0.0%
EMCB

-

Basic Materials

PCY

-

EMCB

-

Communication Services

PCY

-

EMCB

-

Consumer Cyclical

PCY

-

EMCB

-

Consumer Defensive

PCY

-

EMCB

-

Energy

PCY

-

EMCB
100.0%

Healthcare

PCY

-

EMCB

-

Industrials

PCY

-

EMCB

-

Real Estate

PCY

-

EMCB

-

Technology

PCY

-

EMCB

-

Utilities

PCY

-

EMCB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCY vs. EMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCY
PCY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EMCB
EMCB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCY vs. EMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCYEMCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.39

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

8.45

+1.74

PCY vs. EMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCY Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the EMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCY and EMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCYEMCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.78

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.31

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.49

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.46

-0.16

Drawdowns

PCY vs. EMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCY drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, which is greater than EMCB's maximum drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCY and EMCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCYEMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.13%

-22.81%

-26.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.91%

-3.07%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.52%

-4.20%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-21.50%

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.78%

-22.81%

-14.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.80%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-4.23%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

0.87%

+0.58%

Volatility

PCY vs. EMCB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) at 1.56%. This indicates that PCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCYEMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.23%

1.56%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

2.89%

+2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.43%

4.14%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

6.94%

+6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

8.48%

+4.46%

PCY vs. EMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCB's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCY vs. EMCB - Dividend Comparison

PCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than EMCB's 5.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMCB
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
5.36%5.47%5.29%5.09%4.04%3.43%3.85%4.17%4.20%4.04%4.08%5.09%
PCY
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF
5.84%5.93%6.65%6.48%6.81%4.80%4.45%4.78%4.93%4.80%5.19%5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCY and EMCB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCY has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to EMCB (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCY dropped -49.13% vs EMCB's -22.81%.

On 10-year performance, EMCB leads with 4.18% vs 2.71% for PCY. On fees, PCY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EMCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EMCB has performed better with a 4.18% return vs 2.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PCY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMCB.

PCY has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 5.36% for EMCB.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PCY and 0.60% for EMCB.

PCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCY and EMCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer