PCY vs. DCMT
PCY (Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCY is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. PCY is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. Over the past year, PCY returned 11.62% vs 28.33% for DCMT. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. PCY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.
Performance
PCY vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCY achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 25.74% return.
PCY
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 11.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
DCMT
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- YTD
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 28.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCY vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 1.41% | 16.31% | 4.73% |
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 25.74% | 6.04% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCY and DCMT is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | -0.11 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PCY and DCMT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.11 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCY vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank
PCY
DCMT
PCY vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCY | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.78 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 6.45 | +1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCY vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCY drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCY and DCMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCY | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.13% | -15.96% | -33.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.91% | -15.96% | +10.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -9.74% | +7.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -3.51% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 4.40% | -2.94% |
Volatility
PCY vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) is 2.14%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that PCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCY | DCMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 6.10% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.08% | 16.86% | -10.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.34% | 18.80% | -11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 16.03% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 16.03% | -3.09% |
PCY vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCY vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison
PCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than DCMT's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.92% | 3.67% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 5.92% | 5.93% | 6.65% | 6.48% | 6.81% | 4.80% | 4.45% | 4.78% | 4.93% | 4.80% | 5.19% | 5.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCY and DCMT have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DCMT has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to PCY (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCY dropped -49.13% vs DCMT's -15.96%.
On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 28.33% vs 11.62% for PCY. On fees, PCY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PCY has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.
PCY has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 2.92% for DCMT.
PCY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PCY and 0.66% for DCMT.
PCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCY and DCMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer